Abstract:Esophageal cancer has become a malignant tumor disease with high mortality worldwide. Many cases of esophageal cancer are not very serious in the beginning but become severe in the late stage, so the best treatment time is missed. Less than 20% of patients with esophageal cancer are in the late stage of the disease for 5 years. The main treatment method is surgery, which is assisted by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Radical resection is the most effective treatment method, but a method for imaging examination of esophageal cancer with good clinical effect has yet to be developed. This study compared imaging staging of esophageal cancer with pathological staging after operation based on the big data of intelligent medical treatment. MRI can be used to evaluate the depth of esophageal cancer invasion and replace CT and EUS for accurate diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Intelligent medical big data, medical document preprocessing, MRI imaging principal component analysis and comparison and esophageal cancer pathological staging experiments were used. Kappa consistency tests were conducted to compare the consistency between MRI staging and pathological staging and between two observers. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were determined to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of 3.0T MRI accurate staging. Results showed that 3.0T MR high-resolution imaging could show the histological stratification of the normal esophageal wall. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of high-resolution imaging in staging and diagnosis of isolated esophageal cancer specimens reached 80%. At present, preoperative imaging methods for esophageal cancer have obvious limitations, while CT and EUS have certain limitations. Therefore, non-invasive preoperative imaging examination of esophageal cancer should be further explored.Esophageal cancer has become a malignant tumor disease with high mortality worldwide. Many cases of esophageal cancer are not very serious in the beginning but become severe in the late stage, so the best treatment time is missed. Less than 20% of patients with esophageal cancer are in the late stage of the disease for 5 years. The main treatment method is surgery, which is assisted by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Radical resection is the most effective treatment method, but a method for imaging examination of esophageal cancer with good clinical effect has yet to be developed. This study compared imaging staging of esophageal cancer with pathological staging after operation based on the big data of intelligent medical treatment. MRI can be used to evaluate the depth of esophageal cancer invasion and replace CT and EUS for accurate diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Intelligent medical big data, medical document preprocessing, MRI imaging principal component analysis and comparison and esophageal cancer pathological staging experiments were used. Kappa consistency tests were conducted to compare the consistency between MRI staging and pathological staging and between two observers. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were determined to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of 3.0T MRI accurate staging. Results showed that 3.0T MR high-resolution imaging could show the histological stratification of the normal esophageal wall. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of high-resolution imaging in staging and diagnosis of isolated esophageal cancer specimens reached 80%. At present, preoperative imaging methods for esophageal cancer have obvious limitations, while CT and EUS have certain limitations. Therefore, non-invasive preoperative imaging examination of esophageal cancer should be further explored.

Esophageal Carcinoma: Ex Vivo Evaluation by High‐spatial‐resolution T2‐mapping MRI Compared with Histopathological Findings at 3.0T

Potential Use of High-Resolution T2-weighted MRI with Histopathologic Findings in Staging Esophageal Cancer.

Application of 3.0T magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging in the advanced gastric cancer

Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

A prospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, CT and endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative T staging of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

Diagnostic Value of 3.0-Tesla High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Invasion Depth of ;rectal Cancer

CT and MR Imaging for Detecting Neoplastic Invasion of Esophageal Inlet

Esophageal Carcinoma: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MRI Parameters and Histopathological Correlations

Clinical Value of 3. 0 T MRI Diagnosis and Staging in Early Endometrial Carcinoma

Comparative study of imaging staging and postoperative pathological staging of esophageal cancer based on smart medical big data.

Preliminary Study of Ivim-Dwi and Dce-Mri in Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer

The Value of 2D MRI and 3D MRI Sequences in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer

Preoperative Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Using MR 2D Imaging with 3D Reconstruction Techniques

DCE-MRI of esophageal carcinoma using star-VIBE compared with conventional 3D-VIBE

Preoperative diagnosis of gastric cancer using 2-D magnetic resonance imaging with 3-D reconstruction techniques.

SU-GG-I-142: Comparison of 3T MRI and 3D Endorectal Ultrasonography for Evaluating Invasion to Muscularis Propria and Perirectal Tissue in Colorectal Cancer

Assessment of T Staging and Mesorectal Fascia Status Using High-Resolution Mri in Rectal Cancer with Rectal Distention

Early Contrast-Enhanced MR for Diagnosing Complete Tumor Response of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Retrospective Comparative Study

T staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging compared with T2-weighted imaging on 3.0 tesla MRI.

99m Tc-3P 4 -RGD 2 radiotracers for SPECT/CT of esophageal tumor

Significance of computed tomography and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma