A Mixed-Methods Study of Everyday Climate Change Conversations

Carl A. Latkin,Lauren Dayton,Abigail Winiker,Kennedy Countess,Zoé Mistrale Hendrickson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030279

IF: 4.614

2024-02-29

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Understanding everyday conversations about climate change may provide insights into framing the issue to promote climate change action. As part of a longitudinal online study in the US launched in June 2021, 805 respondents were asked if they had discussed climate change with a friend or family member in the prior month; if not, why not, and if yes, they were asked to delineate the conversation topic. Concurrent mixed methods were used to analyze the data. The majority (62.6%) of respondents reported not having a conversation about climate change in the prior month. Among those who indicated that they had discussed climate change, five themes were identified from the conversation topics, with many having reported discussing the impact of climate change on weather patterns. Very few discussed actions to address climate change, and most of these discussions focused on individual-level behaviors rather than collective actions. Among participants who had not recently discussed climate change, the most prevalent theme was that it was not a priority or an issue they cared about. Results suggest that conversations may not lead to collective actions and that policymakers and environmental organizations should provide guidance on effectively channeling climate change concerns into action.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the nature and content of conversations about climate change among the American public in their daily lives, with the goal of providing insights to promote climate change action.

The study collected data through a longitudinal online survey, which was launched in June 2021. Participants were asked whether they had discussed climate change issues with friends or family in the past month. A mixed-methods approach was used to analyze the data, including quantitative statistical analysis and qualitative thematic analysis.

The main findings are as follows:

- The majority of respondents (about 62.6%) had not discussed climate change issues with others in the past month.
- Among those who did engage in discussions, the most common topic was the impact of climate change on weather patterns (e.g., the increase in extreme weather events), but few discussed specific actions to address climate change.
- In terms of the content of the discussions, most focused on behavior changes at the individual level rather than collective action or policy-level changes.
- For those who did not participate in climate change discussions, the most common reasons were that they did not consider it a priority issue or it was not a topic of interest to them.

In summary, this paper seeks to answer the following questions:
- How does the public talk about climate change in their daily lives?
- Do these conversations have the potential to promote collective action to address climate change?
- If not, what are the barriers and how can they be overcome?