Structural Organization of the Inactive X Chromosome in the Mouse
Luca Giorgetti,Bryan R. Lajoie,Ava C. Carter,Mikael Attia,Ye Zhan,Jin Xu,Chong Jian Chen,Noam Kaplan,Howard Y. Chang,Edith Heard,Job Dekker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18589
IF: 64.8
2016-01-01
Nature
Abstract:An in-depth analysis of the structure, chromatin accessibility and expression status of the mouse inactive X (Xi) chromosome provides insights into the regulation of Xi chromosome structure, its dependence on the macrosatellite DXZ4 region, the Xist non-coding RNA, as well as the basis for topologically associating domain (TAD) formation on the Xi. During female development, X-chromosome inactivation is triggered by upregulation of the non-coding Xist RNA from one of the two X chromosomes. Chromosome conformation capture approaches have shown a loss of local structure on the inactive X (Xi) and formation of large mega-domains, separated by a region containing the DXZ4 macrosatellite. These authors investigate the structure, chromatin accessibility and expression status of the mouse Xi using allele-specific Hi-C, ATAC–seq and RNA–seq in embryonic stem cells and neural progenitor cells (NPCs). The Xi in NPCs lacks topologically associating domains (TADs) except around genes that escape X-chromosome inactivation, suggesting that TAD formation is driven by gene activity. The DXZ4-containing region and Xist shape the mega-domain structure of the Xi. X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) involves major reorganization of the X chromosome as it becomes silent and heterochromatic. During female mammalian development, XCI is triggered by upregulation of the non-coding Xist RNA from one of the two X chromosomes. Xist coats the chromosome in cis and induces silencing of almost all genes via its A-repeat region1,2, although some genes (constitutive escapees) avoid silencing in most cell types, and others (facultative escapees) escape XCI only in specific contexts3. A role for Xist in organizing the inactive X (Xi) chromosome has been proposed4,5,6. Recent chromosome conformation capture approaches have revealed global loss of local structure on the Xi chromosome and formation of large mega-domains, separated by a region containing the DXZ4 macrosatellite7,8,9,10. However, the molecular architecture of the Xi chromosome, in both the silent and expressed regions, remains unclear. Here we investigate the structure, chromatin accessibility and expression status of the mouse Xi chromosome in highly polymorphic clonal neural progenitors (NPCs) and embryonic stem cells. We demonstrate a crucial role for Xist and the DXZ4-containing boundary in shaping Xi chromosome structure using allele-specific genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) analysis, an assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high throughput sequencing (ATAC–seq) and RNA sequencing. Deletion of the boundary disrupts mega-domain formation, and induction of Xist RNA initiates formation of the boundary and the loss of DNA accessibility. We also show that in NPCs, the Xi chromosome lacks active/inactive compartments and topologically associating domains (TADs), except around genes that escape XCI. Escapee gene clusters display TAD-like structures and retain DNA accessibility at promoter-proximal and CTCF-binding sites. Furthermore, altered patterns of facultative escape genes in different neural progenitor clones are associated with the presence of different TAD-like structures after XCI. These findings suggest a key role for transcription and CTCF in the formation of TADs in the context of the Xi chromosome in neural progenitors.