Abstract:Wildlife populations can be unmarked, meaning individuals lack distinguishing features for individual identification. Populations may also exhibit non‐independent movements, meaning individuals move together. For populations of either unmarked or non‐independent individuals, models based on spatial capture–recapture (SCR) approaches can be used to estimate abundance, density, and other parameters critical for monitoring, management, and conservation. However, when individuals are both unmarked and non‐independent, few model options are available. One approach has been to apply unmarked models and not address the non‐independence despite unquantified impacts on bias, precision, and the ability to make robust ecological inferences. We conducted a simulation study to quantify the impact of non‐independence on the performance of spatial count (SC) and spatial partial identity models (SPIM) – two SCR‐based unmarked modeling approaches – and used the performance of fully marked and independent SCR as a reference. We varied the levels of non‐independence (aggregation and cohesion), detection probability, and the number of partial identity covariates used to resolve identities in SPIM estimation. We expected abundance estimates to be increasingly biased and precise as aggregation and cohesion increased. Results showed that models indeed became less robust to increasing non‐independence, but importantly suggested that only SPIM could be reliably applied under low levels of cohesion when sufficient partial identity covariates are available. SC yielded consistently biased estimates with poor precision. SCR was consistently robust across combinations of aggregation and cohesion, as expected. We therefore advise against the use of SC models for estimating population parameters when individuals are known to be non‐independent, caution that SPIM may be used under narrow ecological conditions, and encourage continued investigations into sampling design and methods development for estimating populations of unmarked and non‐independent individuals.

An Empirical Study on Independence-Driven Data Selection for Improving Capture-Recapture Estimation

An Empirical Evaluation of Capture-Recapture Estimators in Software Inspection

Towards Confidence with Capture-recapture Estimation

Does Detecting More Defects Contribute to Better Estimation? an Empirical Investigation to the Capture-Recapture Method.

A Method to Evaluate Estimates Produced by the Capture-Recapture Model.

Dependence-Robust Confidence Intervals for Capture-Recapture Surveys

The adoption of capture-recapture in software engineering: a systematic literature review

Novel Robust Least-Squares Estimator for Linear Dynamic Data Reconciliation

Tailoring Capture-Recapture Methods to Estimate Registry-Based Case Counts Based on Error-Prone Diagnostic Signals

A Robust Computerized Adaptive Testing Approach in Educational Question Retrieval

Evaluating tools for capture-recapture model selection to estimate the size of hidden populations: It works in practice, but does it work in theory?

The importance of independence in unmarked spatial capture–recapture analysis

Consequences of ignoring variable and spatially autocorrelated detection probability in spatial capture-recapture

A capture-recapture modeling framework emphasizing expert opinion in disease surveillance

Minimum chi-square method for estimating population size in capture-recapture experiments

Population size estimation with capture-recapture in presence of individual misidentification and low recapture

Rejective Sampling, Rerandomization and Regression Adjustment in Survey Experiments

Effective Attribute Selection for Multi-dimensional Root Cause Analysis.

Model Quality Aware RANSAC: A Robust Camera Motion Estimator

Modelling spatially autocorrelated detection probabilities in spatial capture-recapture using random effects

Toward More Rigorous and Practical Cardinality Estimation for Large-Scale RFID Systems.