Conceptual framework for tinnitus: a cognitive model in practice

Iman Ghodratitoostani,Zahra Vaziri,Milton Miranda Neto,Camila de Giacomo Carneiro Barros,Alexandre Cláudio Botazzo Delbem,Miguel Angelo Hyppolito,Hamid Jalilvand,Francisco Louzada,Joao Pereira Leite
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48006-7
IF: 4.6
2024-03-28
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Tinnitus is a conscious attended awareness perception of sourceless sound. Widespread theoretical and evidence-based neurofunctional and psychological models have tried to explain tinnitus-related distress considering the influence of psychological and cognitive factors. However, tinnitus models seem to be less focused on causality, thereby easily misleading interpretations. Also, they may be incapable of individualization. This study proposes a Conceptual Cognitive Framework (CCF) providing insight into cognitive mechanisms involved in the predisposition, precipitation, and perpetuation of tinnitus and consequent cognitive-emotional disturbances. The current CCF for tinnitus relies on evaluative conditional learning and appraisal, generating negative valence (emotional value) and arousal (cognitive value) to annoyance, distress, and distorted perception. The suggested methodology is well-defined, reproducible, and accessible, which can help foster future high-quality clinical databases. Perceived tinnitus through the perpetual-learning process can always lead to annoyance, but only in the clinical stage directly cause annoyance. In the clinical stage, tinnitus perception can lead indirectly to distress only with experiencing annoyance either with (" " = 1.87; 95% CI 1.18–2.72)["1st indirect path in the Clinical stage model": Tinnitus Loudness Attention Bias Cognitive-Emotional Value Annoyance Clinical Distress]or without (" "= 2.03; 95% CI 1.02–3.32)[ "2nd indirect path in the Clinical stage model": Tinnitus Loudness Annoyance Clinical Distress] the perpetual-learning process. Further real-life testing of the CCF is expected to express a meticulous, decision-supporting platform for cognitive rehabilitation and clinical interventions. Furthermore, the suggested methodology offers a reliable platform for CCF development in other cognitive impairments and supports the causal clinical data models. It may also enhance our knowledge of psychological disorders and complicated comorbidities by supporting the design of different rehabilitation interventions and comprehensive frameworks in line with the "preventive medicine" policy.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to propose and verify a new Conceptual Cognitive Framework (CCF) to explain the cognitive mechanisms of tinnitus - related distress and pain. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Clarify causal relationships**: Existing tinnitus models are deficient in explaining causal relationships and are prone to misinterpretation. Therefore, this paper attempts to clarify causal relationships by introducing CCF and provide more reliable explanations. 2. **Personalized and individualized treatment**: Existing models may not be able to achieve individualization, while CCF attempts to provide theoretical support for individualized treatment by understanding the complex interactions between cognition, emotion, and perception. 3. **Explain different stages of tinnitus**: CCF distinguishes between the neutral stage (no pain response) and the clinical pain stage (with pain response) and explores the transition mechanism from one stage to another. Specifically: - In the neutral stage, although there are negative cognitive - emotional evaluations, they are not sufficient to trigger a pain response. - In the clinical stage, the Continuous - Learning - Path enhances the sense of annoyance and eventually leads to pain. 4. **Multi - mediator causal modeling**: To verify the hypotheses in CCF, the author uses the multi - mediator causal modeling method. By analyzing the mediating effects between different variables, the effectiveness of CCF is further proven. ### Specific problem description - **Definition of tinnitus**: Tinnitus is a Continuous Attended Awareness Perception (CAAP) of passive sounds. Approximately 10% of young people, 14% of middle - aged people, and 25% of the elderly have experienced this auditory hallucination phenomenon. - **Limitations of existing models**: Although there are many theoretical and empirical models attempting to explain tinnitus - related pain, these models often overlook causal relationships and are difficult to apply individually. - **The proposed CCF model**: CCF is based on the Evaluative Conditional Learning (ECL) mechanism and explains how tinnitus causes annoyance and pain through cognitive and emotional evaluations. The model assumes that during the tinnitus perception process, negative emotional and cognitive evaluations will enhance the sense of annoyance, which in turn leads to a pain response. ### Key hypotheses - **Neutral stage**: Negative cognitive - emotional evaluations can cause annoyance but are not sufficient to trigger a pain response. - **Clinical stage**: Tinnitus perception directly or through the Continuous - Learning - Path enhances the sense of annoyance and eventually leads to a pain response. - **Multi - mediator causal modeling**: In the clinical stage, intermittent pain experiences will lead to misperception of tinnitus loudness. ### Methodology - **Data sources**: Data are from two studies: a prospective cohort study and a randomized cross - over three - session double - blind study. - **Statistical analysis**: SPSS v.26 and PROCESS macro are used for data analysis. 10,000 bias - corrected bootstrap samples and a fixed random - seed '12020' are adopted, with a confidence level of 95% and a significance level of p < 0.05. Through the above methods, this study aims to fill the gaps in the existing literature regarding the causal relationships of tinnitus and provide a reliable basis for future research and clinical interventions.