Perfectionism in Gifted Students

Kristie Speirs Neumeister

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003238928-4

2021-09-13

Abstract:This chapter provides a summary of the central findings and limitations of this research and offers a road map for promising avenues for future research on perfectionism. The Non-Perfectionists did not hold high standards for themselves and were not particularly conscientious or concerned about their mistakes. Healthy Perfectionists did hold high standards for themselves but also were not overly concerned with their mistakes. The inconsistency in the literature with regard to how perfectionism has been defined, measured, and categorized has led to difficulty in interpreting research findings. The interpretation of prior research on perfectionism has been plagued by inconsistency with regard to measurement of perfectionism, operationalization of giftedness, age of participants, and participants’ educational context. Standardizing and/or controlling for these factors in future research will help clarify our interpretation of research findings. Researchers have offered theoretical and practical suggestions for those working with students struggling with fear of failure and concern over evaluation.