Assessment of ventricular electrical heterogeneity in left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing by using various electrophysiological methods
Jesse H. J. Rijks,Luuk Heckman,Sjoerd Westra,Richard Cornelussen,Subham Ghosh,Karol Curila,Radovan Smisek,Domenico Grieco,Edoardo Bressi,Uyên Châu Nguyên,Joost Lumens,Antonius M.W. van Stipdonk,Dominik Linz,Frits W. Prinzen,Justin G. L. M. Luermans,Kevin Vernooy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16435
IF: 2.7
2024-09-25
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:LBBAP = left bundle branch area pacing; LVSP = left ventricular septal pacing; LBBP = left bundle branch pacing; LBBB = left bundle branch block; RV = right ventricle; aLBBAP = LBBAP with anodal stimulation. Introduction Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) comprises pacing at the left ventricular septum (LVSP) or left bundle branch (LBBP). The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences in ventricular electrical heterogeneity between LVSP, LBBP, right ventricular pacing (RVP) and intrinsic conduction with different dyssynchrony measures using the ECG, vectorcardiograpy, ECG belt, and Ultrahigh frequency (UHF‐)ECG. Methods Thirty‐seven patients with a pacemaker indication for bradycardia or cardiac resynchronization therapy underwent LBBAP implantation. ECG, vectorcardiogram, ECG belt and UHF‐ECG signals were recorded during RVP, LVSP and LBBP, and intrinsic activation. QRS duration (QRSd) was measured from the ECG, QRS area was calculated from the vectorcardiogram, LV activation time (LVAT) and standard deviation of activation time (SDAT) from ECG belt and electrical dyssynchrony (e‐DYS16) from UHF‐ECG. Results Both LVSP and LBBP significantly reduced ventricular electrical heterogeneity as compared to underlying LBBB and RV pacing in terms of QRS area (p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems