Abstract:AbstractMany Chinese cities are becoming more polycentric during the last decade of rapid urban expansion. In this study, we attempt to explore the relationship between travel behaviour and polycentric built environment for both work and non‐work trips by multiple multinomial logit mode choice models for work and non‐work travel. The choice set is comprised of: driving a private car, taking the bus and taking the subway. The empirical analysis in this paper is based on the 2005 Shenzhen Personal Travel Survey. The model specifications tested a set of variables describing trip mode attributes, household socio‐demographics, and polycentric centre types such as regional centres, district centres, district subcentres and suburbs. The results indicate that urban form is an important factor in affecting mode choice: people living or working in a regional city centre are more likely to take public transportation, compared to those living in subcentres and suburbs. The results also imply that people perceive a higher influence of built environment on mode choice for work trips than non‐work trips. These research findings support the contention that different types of urban centres can meaningfully influence how residents travel, even after controlling for socio‐economic characteristics.Resumen. Muchas ciudades chinas han estado haciéndose cada vez más policéntricas durante la rápida expansión de la última década. En este estudio, intentamos explorar la relación entre el comportamiento respecto al transporte urbano y los entornos policéntricos en relación con los desplazamientos por motivos laborales y no laborales, empleando modelos de selección de modo logit multinomial múltiple para desplazamientos laborales y no laborales. El abanico de elección se compone de: utilizar el propio vehículo, tomar el autobús y tomar el metro. El análisis empírico de este artículo se basa en la Encuesta Personal de Transporte en Shenzen de 2005. Las especificaciones del modelo han experimentado con un conjunto de variables que describen atributos del modo de viajar, la socio‐demografía de los hogares, y los diferentes tipos de centros policéntricos, como pueden ser centros regionales, de distrito, subcentros de distrito y suburbios. Los resultados indican que la configuración urbana es un factor importante que afecta el modo de selección: es más probable que las personas que viven o trabajan en un centro de ciudad regional usen el transporte público, en comparación con las que viven en subcentros y en los suburbios. Los resultados implican asimismo que las personas perciben una mayor influencia del entorno urbano al seleccionar el modo de desplazamiento al trabajo en comparación con los desplazamientos no laborales. Estos hallazgos apoyan el argumento de que los diferentes tipos de centros urbanos pueden influir poderosamente en el modo de desplazamiento de los residentes, incluso después de controlar las características socioeconómicas.graphic

Commuter choice of UAM-friendly neighborhoods

Exploring Preferences for Transportation Modes in an Urban Air Mobility Environment: Munich Case Study

Polycentric Spatial Structure and Travel Mode Choice: the Case of Shenzhen, China

Does Subway Proximity Discourage Automobility? Evidence from Beijing

Modeling the joint choice behavior of commuters' travel mode and parking options for private autonomous vehicles

Urban air mobility (UAM): Airport shuttles or city-taxis?

Integrated Network Design and Demand Forecast for On-Demand Urban Air Mobility

Potential market based policy considerations for urban air mobility

Commuting behaviors response to living and working built environment: Dissecting interaction effects from varied supply and demand masses

Nationwide Demand Modeling for an Urban Air Mobility Commuting Mission

Public Perception of UAM: Are we ready for the new mobility that we have dreamed of?

Does Better Subway Accessibility Discourage Driving? An Analysis Based On 2009 Micro Survey In Beijing

Where to park an autonomous vehicle? Results of a stated choice experiment

Joint Analysis of the Commuting Departure Time and Travel Mode Choice: Role of the Built Environment

Optimal planning of urban air mobility systems accounting for ground access trips

Commuting Mode Choice in a High-Density City: Do Land-Use Density and Diversity Matter in Hong Kong?

Built Environment, Peak Hours and Route Choice Efficiency: an Investigation of Commuting Efficiency Using GPS Data

Quantifying Residential Self-Selection Effects on Commuting Mode Choice: A Natural Experiment

Influence Factors on Travel Mode Preference of Working Residents Living Far Away from Downtown Area on Workdays: A Hybrid Method Integrating Correlated Random Parameter Logit Model and Apriori Algorithm

Maximum capture problem for urban air mobility network design

Traffic Safety Perception, Attitude, and Feeder Mode Choice of Metro Commute: Evidence from Shenzhen