Abstract:Abstract: The effects of asymmetric information are often difficult to detect empirically, such as in insurance settings (Chiappori, Jullien, Salanie and Salanie, 2006). We show that allowing for the possibility of referencedependent preferences can assist with this challenge. Using detailed auto insurance claims data and adopting the methodology of Allen, DeChow, Pope and Wu (2017) which studies reference-dependence in marathon finishing times, we show that policyholders exaggerate their damage claims in a manner consistent with referencedependent moral hazard. Consistent with our theoretical model of reference-dependent claims, we find stronger reference-dependent behavior among policyholders with higher premium levels and low risk policyholders. Also consistent with the model, policyholders are more reference-dependent in their first claims than in subsequent claims, and in the second half of the coverage year compared to the first half. The detected reference point is the amount of the original premium paid in other words, in claiming their accident damages, policyholders seek to claim back the original price of their insurance. We do not find robust patterns in the concentration of insurance claims at round number percentages greater than or less than the full premium amount, such as 90% or 110%, nor at round number nominal amounts. This implies that the unnatural claim behavior is motivated significantly by loss aversion regarding the premium paid rather than merely wanting to increase one’s claims more generally. Since damage claims can only be this precisely manipulated by the policy holder after an accident, the findings can be attributed primarily to ex-post moral hazard but not adverse selection or ex-ante moral hazard. Furthermore, the pattern exists only for individually-held policies but not corporate-held policies, which is consistent with a reference point in individual utility. Our study illustrates the potential of behavioral economics frameworks in assisting with identification challenges for classical economic problems.

Household Refundable Utility by taking out refundable insurance: Empirical study in the Spanish auto insurance market

Private Health Insurance and Financial Risk Taking in Spain-The Moderating Effect of Subjective Risk Tolerance

Estimating risk preferences integrating insurance choices with subjective beliefs

Portfolio Choice with Indivisible and Illiquid Housing Assets: The Case of Spain

Utility Function's Influence on Insurance Policy Customer Choices

The Perception of Residential Water Tariff, Consumption, and Cost: Evidence of its Determinants Using Survey Data

On actual carpooling behaviour: a nationwide study in Spain

No-claim refunds and healthcare use

Price and budget elasticities under utility poverty policies in Spain

The impact of measured income uncertainty on Spanish household consumption at the end of the Great Recession

Consumer Expectations of Online Services in the Insurance Industry: An Exploratory Study of Drivers and Outcomes

Insurtech, sensor data, and changes in customers' coverage choices: Evidence from usage‐based automobile insurance

Risk Self-Selection and the Concept of Equilibrium in a Competitive Insurance Market

A practical model for pricing optimization in car insurance

Semi-autonomous vehicles: Usage-based data evidences of what could be expected from eliminating speed limit violations

Utility, Risk and Demand for Incomplete Insurance: Lab Experiments with Guatemalan Co-Operatives

Pricing weekly motor insurance drivers' with behavioral and contextual telematics data

Consistent Estimation of a Censored Demand System and Welfare Analysis: The 2012 VAT Reform in Spain

Exaggerating to Break-Even: Reference-Dependent Moral Hazard in Auto Insurance Claims

R&D Subsidies in Spain: are they Really Useful?

Consumption Smoothing,Risk Sharing and Full Insurance——An Empirical Research on Urban Household Survey