Acute changes in cardiac dimensions, function, and longitudinal mechanics in healthy individuals with and without high‐altitude induced pulmonary hypertension at 4559 m

Derliz Mereles,Jens Rudolph,Sebastian Greiner,Matthias Aurich,Norbert Frey,Hugo A. Katus,Peter Bärtsch,Christoph Dehnert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.15786
2024-02-24
Echocardiography
Abstract:(A) Timeline and altitude reached during the course of the study. First assessment 6 hours after arrival (M1), assessments at day 3 (M2) and 4 (M3) before descent. (B) Systolic pulmonary artery pressures assessed in normobaric normoxia in Heidelberg (H) and during each of 3 days under hypobaric hypoxia at 4559 m altitude (M). M‐HAPE: subjects who developed high‐altitude pulmonary edema in one of 3 days at M, H‐PH: subjects who developed pulmonary hypertension in the hypoxic chamber in H, H‐N: subjects who did not develop PH in H. (C) Sankey diagram showing shifts in groups from H to M according to the development (red) or not (green) of high‐altitude pulmonary hypertension. HAPE probands are shown in color blue. (D) sPAP in normobaric normoxia in Heidelberg (NN) and in hypobaric hypoxia at 4559 m (HH) (E) Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), dotted line shows a SaO2 cutoff level of 80 % Background High‐altitude pulmonary hypertension (HAPH) has a prevalence of approximately 10%. Changes in cardiac morphology and function at high altitude, compared to a population that does not develop HAPH are scarce. Methods Four hundred twenty‐one subjects were screened in a hypoxic chamber inspiring a FiO2 = 12% for 2 h. In 33 subjects an exaggerated increase in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) could be confirmed in two independent measurements. Twenty nine of these, and further 24 matched subjects without sPAP increase were examined at 4559 m by Doppler echocardiography including global longitudinal strain (GLS). Results SPAP increase was higher in HAPH subjects (∆ = 10.2 vs. ∆ = 32.0 mm Hg, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?