Oncologic outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery versus open partial laryngectomies in the management of early stage glottic carcinoma
Hongli Gong,Qiang Huang,Yong Shi,Chunli Gao,Chi-Yao Hsueh,Chunping Wu,Lei Tao,Ming Zhang,Jian Zhou,Pengyu Cao,Liang Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103551
Abstract:Background: The oncologic outcomes between transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and open partial laryngectomy (OPL) using comprehensive analysis in one clinical center is rare. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of TLM in patients with early stage glottic carcinoma, and to compare the results with OPL. Subjects and methods: Records of 425 glottic carcinoma patients with T1 - T2 stage treated with TLM, vertical partial laryngectomy (VPL), and cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) from 2005 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and laryngeal function preservation (LFP) of these three treatments were assessed. Results: One hundred and twenty-two patients were treated with TLM. Regarding OPL, 167 patients underwent VPL, and 136 patients underwent CHEP. The mean age was 59.7 years, with men accounting for 97.2 % of all cases. The OS, DSS, and LFP rates of patients with anterior commissure (AC) involvement undergoing TLM were worse than those of patients without AC involvement, but these differences were not statistically significant. The 5-year OS, DSS, and LFP of patients undergoing TLM were 88.4 %, 89.9 %, and 83.5 %, respectively, and the oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing TLM, VPL, and CHEP were not statistically different. Conclusion: Glottic carcinoma patients with early stage treated with TLM experience satisfactory oncologic outcomes. No compelling difference in oncologic outcomes among three treatments of TLM, VPL and CHEP, as well as VPL and CHEP can be alternatives to patients who are not suitable for receiving TLM.