Abstract:With the increasing number of software projects, within-project defect prediction (WPDP) has already been unable to meet the demand, and cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) is playing an increasingly significant role in the area of software engineering. The classic CPDP methods mainly concentrated on applying metric features to predict defects. However, these approaches failed to consider the rich semantic information, which usually contains the relationship between software defects and context. Since traditional methods are unable to exploit this characteristic, their performance is often unsatisfactory. In this paper, a transfer long short-term memory (TLSTM) network model is first proposed. Transfer semantic features are extracted by adding a transfer learning algorithm to the long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Then, the traditional metric features and semantic features are combined for CPDP. First, the abstract syntax trees (AST) are generated based on the source codes. Second, the AST node contents are converted into integer vectors as inputs to the TLSTM model. Then, the semantic features of the program can be extracted by TLSTM. On the other hand, transferable metric features are extracted by transfer component analysis (TCA). Finally, the semantic features and metric features are combined and input into the logical regression (LR) classifier for training. The presented TLSTM model performs better on the f-measure indicator than other machine and deep learning models, according to the outcomes of several open-source projects of the PROMISE repository. The TLSTM model built with a single feature achieves 0.7% and 2.1% improvement on Log4j-1.2 and Xalan-2.7, respectively. When using combined features to train the prediction model, we call this model a transfer long short-term memory for defect prediction (DPTLSTM). DPTLSTM achieves a 2.9% and 5% improvement on Synapse-1.2 and Xerces-1.4.4, respectively. Both prove the superiority of the proposed model on the CPDP task. This is because LSTM capture long-term dependencies in sequence data and extract features that contain source code structure and context information. It can be concluded that: (1) the TLSTM model has the advantage of preserving information, which can better retain the semantic features related to software defects; (2) compared with the CPDP model trained with traditional metric features, the performance of the model can validly enhance by combining semantic features and metric features.

Heterogeneous Cross-Company Defect Prediction by Unified Metric Representation and CCA-based Transfer Learning

Cost-sensitive transfer kernel canonical correlation analysis for heterogeneous defect prediction

HYDRA: Massively Compositional Model for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

MHCPDP: multi-source heterogeneous cross-project defect prediction via multi-source transfer learning and autoencoder

Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction Based on SMOTE and Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis

User Distribution Mapping Modelling with Collaborative Filtering for Cross Domain Recommendation

Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction Using Feature-Based Transfer Learning

Heterogeneous Defect Prediction Through Joint Metric Selection and Matching

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

Balanced Adversarial Tight Matching for Cross‐Project Defect Prediction

Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptation for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction

A software defect prediction method with metric compensation based on feature selection and transfer learning

DSSDPP: Data Selection and Sampling Based Domain Programming Predictor for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Multi-Source Heterogeneous Kernel Mapping in Software Defect Prediction

Multi-source Heterogeneous Software Defect Prediction Method

Landmark-Based Domain Adaptation and Selective Pseudo-Labeling for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction

Cross-Project Defect Prediction Considering Multiple Data Distribution Simultaneously

Aligned Metric Representation Based Balanced Multiset Ensemble Learning for Heterogeneous Defect Prediction

Collective transfer learning for defect prediction

Heterogeneous Defect Prediction with Two-Stage Ensemble Learning

Cross-Project Defect Prediction Using Transfer Learning with Long Short-Term Memory Networks