Abstract:Bug fixing is one of the most important activities in software development and maintenance. Bugs are reported, recorded, and managed in bug tracking systems such as Bugzilla. In general, a bug report contains many fields, such as product, component, severity, priority, fixer, operating system (OS), and platform, which provide important information for the bug triaging and fixing process. Our previous study finds that approximately 80% of bug reports have their fields reassigned and refined at least once, and bugs with reassigned and refined fields take more time to fix than bugs with no reassigned and refined fields. Thus, automatically predicting which bug report fields get reassigned and refined could help developers to save bug fixing time. Considering that a bug report could have multiple field re-assignments and refinements (e.g., the product, component, fixer, and other fields of a bug report can get reassigned and refined), in this paper, we propose a multi-label learning algorithm to predict which bug report fields might be reassigned and refined. We note that the number of bug reports with some types of reassignment and refinement (e.g., bugs whose severity fields gets reassigned and refined) is a small proportion of the whole bug report collection, indicating the class imbalance problem. Thus, we propose imbalanced ML.KNN (Im-ML.KNN), which extends ML.KNN, one of the state-of-the-art multi-label learning algorithms, to achieve better performance. Im-ML.KNN is a composite model that combines 3 multi-label classifiers built using different types of features (i.e., meta, textual, and mixed features). We evaluate our solution on 4 large bug report datasets including OpenOffice, Netbeans, Eclipse, and Mozilla containing a total of 190,558 bug reports. We show that Im-ML.KNN can achieve an average F-measure score of 0.56-0.62. We also compare Im-ML.KNN with other state-of-art methods, such as the method proposed by Lamkanfi et al., ML.KNN, and HOMER-NB. The results show that Im-ML.KNN, on average, improves the average F-measure scores of Lamkanfi et al.'s method, ML.KNN, and HOMER-NB by 119.69%, 9.11%, and 161.08%, respectively.

Inferring Test Models from Kate's Bug Reports Using Multi-objective Search.

Should We Learn Probabilistic Models for Model Checking? A New Approach and An Empirical Study.

Learning Likely Invariants to Explain Why a Program Fails

Learning Probabilistic Models for Model Checking: an Evolutionary Approach and an Empirical Study

Using Finite-State Models for Log Differencing

Automated Bug Report Field Reassignment and Refinement Prediction

"Automated Debugging Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful A User Study Revisiting the Usefulness of Spectra-Based Fault Localization Techniques with Professionals Using Real Bugs from Large Systems

Detecting DBMS Bugs with Context-Sensitive Instantiation and Multi-Plan Execution

Knowledge Graph Driven Inference Testing for Question Answering Software

High-Impact Bug Report Identification with Imbalanced Learning Strategies

An Efficient Model Inference Algorithm for Learning-based Testing of Reactive Systems

Automated Identification of High Impact Bug Reports Leveraging Imbalanced Learning Strategies

An Approximation-based Approach for the Random Exploration of Large Models

Using model checking to generate test cases for class testing

Knowledge transfer based many-objective approach for finding bugs in multi-path loops

An Empirical Evaluation of Capture-Recapture Estimators in Software Inspection

Improve Model Testing by Integrating Bounded Model Checking and Coverage Guided Fuzzing

Automated Documentation Inference to Explain Failed Tests

Large Language Models are Few-shot Testers: Exploring LLM-based General Bug Reproduction

User Modelling for Avoiding Overfitting in Interactive Knowledge Elicitation for Prediction

Watch out for Version Mismtaching and Data Leakage! A Case Study of Their Influence in Bug Report Based Bug Localization Models