Abstract:Lattice-based cryptography has recently emerged as a prime candidate for efficient and secure post-quantum cryptography. The two main hard problems underlying its security are the shortest vector problem (SVP) and the closest vector problem (CVP). Various algorithms have been studied for solving these problems, and for SVP, lattice sieving currently dominates in terms of the asymptotic time complexity: one can heuristically solve SVP in time $$2^{0.292d + o(d)}$$ in high dimensions d [Becker–Ducas–Gama–Laarhoven, SODA’16]. Although several SVP algorithms can also be used to solve CVP, it is not clear whether this also holds for heuristic lattice sieving methods. The best time complexity for CVP is currently $$2^{0.377d + o(d)}$$ [Becker–Gama–Joux, ANTS’14].In this paper we revisit sieving algorithms for solving SVP, and study how these algorithms can be modified to solve CVP and its variants as well. Our first method is aimed at solving one problem instance and minimizes the overall time complexity for a single CVP instance with a time complexity of $$2^{0.292d + o(d)}$$. Our second method minimizes the amortized time complexity for several instances on the same lattice, at the cost of a larger preprocessing cost. Using nearest neighbor searching with a balanced space-time tradeoff, with this method we can solve the closest vector problem with preprocessing (CVPP) with $$2^{0.636d + o(d)}$$ space and preprocessing, in $$2^{0.136d + o(d)}$$ time, while the query complexity can be further reduced to $$2^{0.059d + o(d)}$$ at the cost of $$2^{d + o(d)}$$ space and preprocessing, or even to $$2^{\varepsilon d + o(d)}$$ for arbitrary $$\varepsilon > 0$$, at the cost of preprocessing time and memory complexities of $$(1/\varepsilon )^{O(d)}$$.For easier variants of CVP, such as approximate CVP and bounded distance decoding (BDD), we further show how the preprocessing method achieves even better complexities. For instance, we can solve approximate CVPP with large approximation factors $$\kappa $$ with polynomial-sized advice in polynomial time if $$\kappa = \varOmega (\sqrt{d / \log d})$$. This heuristically closes the gap between the decision-CVPP result of [Aharonov–Regev, FOCS’04] (with equivalent $$\kappa $$) and the search-CVPP result of [Dadush–Regev–Stephens-Davidowitz, CCC’14] (which required larger $$\kappa $$).

Solving Closest Vector Instances Using an Approximate Shortest Independent Vectors Oracle

On the Closest Vector Problem with a Distance Guarantee

Accelerating Exact Nearest Neighbor Search in High Dimensional Euclidean Space Via Block Vectors

Sieving for Closest Lattice Vectors (with Preprocessing)

Efficient Approximate Algorithms for the Closest Pair Problem in High Dimensional Spaces.

Short Paths on the Voronoi Graph and the Closest Vector Problem with Preprocessing

A Genetic Algorithm for Searching the Shortest Lattice Vector of SVP Challenge

Space-efficient classical and quantum algorithms for the shortest vector problem

The Closest Vector Problem On Some Lattices

A Linear-Time Algorithm for the Closest Vector Problem of Triangular Lattices

On the SVP for low-dimensional circulant lattices

New Transference Theorems on Lattices Possessing Nϵ-Unique Shortest Vectors

Improved Classical and Quantum Algorithms for the Shortest Vector Problem via Bounded Distance Decoding

Qubo model for the Closest Vector Problem

Random Sampling on an High-Dimensional Sphere for Solving SVP

Why we couldn't prove SETH hardness of the Closest Vector Problem for even norms!

Inapproximability of Sparsest Vector in a Real Subspace

Variational quantum solutions to the Shortest Vector Problem

Finding Shortest Lattice Vectors in the Presence of Gaps

Orthogonalized Lattice Enumeration for Solving SVP.