Abstract:Random Field Theory has been used in the fMRI literature to address the multiple comparisons problem. The method provides an analytical solution for the computation of precise p-values when its assumptions are met. When its assumptions are not met the thresholds generated by Random Field Theory can be more conservative than Bonferroni corrections, which are arguably too stringent for use in fMRI. As this has been well documented theoretically it is surprising that a majority of current studies (~80%) would not meet the assumptions of Random Field Theory and therefore would have reduced sensitivity. Specifically most data is not smooth enough to meet the good lattice assumption. Current studies smooth data on average by twice the voxel size which is rarely sufficient to meet the good lattice assumption. The amount of smoothing required for Random Field Theory to produce accurate p-values increases with image resolution and decreases with degrees of freedom. There is no rule of thumb that is valid for all study designs but for typical data (3mm resolution, and greater than 20 subjects) residual smoothness with FWHM = 4 times voxel size should produce valid results. However, it should be stressed that for higher spatial resolution and lower degrees of freedom the critical smoothness required will increase sharply. This implies that researchers should carefully choose appropriate smoothing kernels. This can be facilitated by the simulations we provide that identify the critical smoothness at which the application of RFT becomes appropriate. For some applications such as presurgical mapping or, imaging of small structures, probing the laminar/columnar structure of the cortex these smoothness requirements may be too great to preserve spatial structure. As such, this study suggests developments are needed in Random Field Theory to fully exploit the resolution of modern neuroimaging.

A Voxelation-Corrected Non-Stationary 3D Cluster-Size Test Based on Random Field Theory

A High Performance 3D Cluster-Based Test of Unsmoothed Fmri Data

Comparison of a non-stationary voxelation-corrected cluster-size test with TFCE for group-Level MRI inference.

5373 A high performance cluster-based test for subject-and group-level analysis of unsmoothed fMRI data

Statistical Image Reconstruction for Low-Dose Ct Using Nonlocal Means-Based Regularization

Clustered Pixels Analysis for Functional MRI Activation Studies of the Human Brain

Pixel-based statistical analysis by a 3D clustering approach: Application to autoradiographic images

Spatial nonstationarity of image noise in widefield optical imaging and its effects on cluster-based inference for resting-state functional connectivity

Voxel-Wise Correspondence Of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images By Cascaded Randomized Forest

Is Bonferroni correction more sensitive than Random Field Theory for most fMRI studies?

Normalization of Functional Magnetic Resonance Images by Classified Cerebrospinal Fluid Cluster

Determining The Correct Number Of Clusters In The Ct Image Segmentation

Iterative Spatial Fuzzy Clustering for 3D Brain Magnetic Resonance Image Supervoxel Segmentation

A Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm with Robust Spatially Constraint for Brain MR Image Segmentation

Cluster extent inference revisited: quantification and localization of brain activity

Target Fitting Method for Spherical Point Clouds Based on Projection Filtering and K-Means Clustered Voxelization

Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference

Randomized structural sparsity via constrained block subsampling for improved sensitivity of discriminative voxel identification

Clustering Based Low Dose Cerebral Computed Tomography Perfusion Spatio-temporal Restoration

Spatial Multiresolution Cluster Detection Method

Three-dimensional Image Registration Based on Modified Structural Similarity