Abstract:Recently, automatic human activity recognition has drawn much attention. On one hand, this is due to the rapid proliferation and cost degradation of a wide variety of sensing hardware. On the other hand there are urgent growing and pressing demands from many application domains such as: in-home health monitoring especially for the elderly, smart cities, safe driving by monitoring and predicting driver’s behavior, healthcare applications, entertainment, assessment of therapy, performance evaluation in sports, etc. In this paper we focus on activities of daily living (ADL), which are routine activities that people tend to do every day without needing assistance. We have used a public dataset of acceleration data collected with a wrist-worn accelerometer for 14 different ADL activities. Our objective is to perform an extensive comparative study of the predictive power of several paradigms to model and classify ADL activities. To the best of our knowledge, almost all techniques for activity recognition are based on methods from the machine learning literature (particularly, supervised learning). Our comparative study widens the scope of techniques that can be used for automatic analysis of human activities and provides a valuation of the relative effectiveness and efficiency of a potentially myriad pool of techniques. We apply two different paradigms for the analysis and classification of daily living activities: (1) techniques based on supervised machine learning and (2) techniques based on estimating the empirical distribution of the time series data and use metric-theoretic techniques to estimate the dissimilarity between two distributions. We used several evaluation metrics including confusion matrices, overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for each activity, and relative computational performance. In each approach we used some of the well-known techniques in our experimentation and analysis. For example, in supervised learning we applied both support vector machines and random forests. One of the main conclusions from our analysis is that the simplest techniques, for example, using empirical discrete distributions as models, have almost the best performance in terms of both accuracy and computational efficiency.

From Action to Activity: Sensor-based Activity Recognition

Bi-View Semi-Supervised Learning Based Semantic Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometers.

Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition System with a Multilayered Model Using Time Series Shapelets

Exploring Semantics in Activity Recognition Using Context Lattices.

Semantics-Driven Multi-user Concurrent Activity Recognition.

Human Activity Recognition based on Dynamic Spatio-Temporal Relations

Complex Activity Recognition Using Time Series Pattern Dictionary Learned from Ubiquitous Sensors

Deep Learning for Sensor-based Activity Recognition: A Survey

On Using Temporal Features to Create More Accurate Human-Activity Classifiers

Discovery and Recognition of Unknown Activities.

We Know What You Are Doing or Going to Do: Towards Accurate Human Activities Sensing

A Pattern Mining Approach to Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition

Real-Time Activity Recognition in Wireless Body Sensor Networks: from Simple Gestures to Complex Activities

Investigating Deep Neural Network Architecture and Feature Extraction Designs for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition

Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities

A Comparative Study of Feature Selection Approaches for Human Activity Recognition Using Multimodal Sensory Data

Comparative Analysis of Different Approaches to Human Activity Recognition Based on Accelerometer Signals

An Unsupervised Approach to Activity Recognition and Segmentation Based on Object-Use Fingerprints

Effective approaches in human action recognition

A Multi-Layer Classifier Model XR-KS of Human Activity Recognition for the Problem of Similar Human Activity