Lung RecruitmEnt Assessed by EleCtRical Impedance Tomography (RECRUIT): A Multicenter Study of COVID-19 ARDS
Annemijn H Jonkman,Glasiele C Alcala,Bertrand Pavlovsky,Oriol Roca,Savino Spadaro,Gaetano Scaramuzzo,Lu Chen,Jose Dianti,Mayson L de A Sousa,Michael C Sklar,Thomas Piraino,Huiqing Ge,Guang-Qiang Chen,Jian-Xin Zhou,Jie Li,Eduardo Costa,Jordi Mancebo,Tommaso Mauri,Marcelo Amato,Laurent J Brochard,Ewan C. Goligher,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2300oc
IF: 24.7
2023-04-25
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Abstract:RATIONALE: Defining lung recruitability is needed for safe positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection in mechanically ventilated patients. However, there is no simple bedside method including both assessment of recruitability and risks of overdistension as well as personalized PEEP titration.OBJECTIVES: To describe the range of recruitability using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), effects of PEEP on recruitability, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, and a method to select optimal EIT-based PEEP .METHODS: This is the analysis of COVID-19 patients , from an ongoing multicenter prospective physiological study including patients with moderate-severe ARDS of different causes. EIT, ventilator data, hemodynamics and arterial blood gases were obtained during PEEP titration maneuvers. EIT-based optimal PEEP was defined as the crossing point of the overdistension and collapse curves during a decremental PEEP trial. Recruitability was defined as the amount of modifiable collapse when increasing PEEP from 6 to 24 cmH2O (=ΔCollapse24-6). Patients were classified as low, medium or high recruiters based on the tertiles of ΔCollapse24-6.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In 108 COVID-19 patients, recruitability varied from 0.3% to 66.9% and was unrelated to ARDS severity. EIT-based PEEP differed between groups: 10 vs. 13.5 vs. 15.5 cmH2O for low vs. medium vs. high recruitability (p<0.05). This approach assigned a different PEEP level than the highest compliance approach in 81% of patients. The protocol was well tolerated; in 4 patients the PEEP level did not reach 24 cmH2O due to hemodynamic instability.CONCLUSIONS: Recruitability varies widely among COVID-19 patients. EIT allows personalizing PEEP setting as a compromise between recruitability and overdistension. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
respiratory system,critical care medicine