Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer in early stages using multi-parameter MRI: A promising approach for early diagnosis
Jianer Tang,Xiangyi Zheng,Xiao Wang,Qiqi Mao,Liping Xie,Rongjiang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-248011
IF: 1.6
2024-05-18
Technology and Health Care
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic test for prostate cancer, but it is an invasive examination of non-targeted puncture and has a high false-negative rate. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to develop a computer-assisted prostate cancer diagnosis method based on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) images. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 106 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy after diagnosis with prostate biopsy. mpMRI images, including T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE), and were accordingly analyzed. We extracted the region of interest (ROI) about the tumor and benign area on the three sequential MRI axial images at the same level. The ROI data of 433 mpMRI images were obtained, of which 202 were benign and 231 were malignant. Of those, 50 benign and 50 malignant images were used for training, and the 333 images were used for verification. Five main feature groups, including histogram, GLCM, GLGCM, wavelet-based multi-fractional Brownian motion features and Minkowski function features, were extracted from the mpMRI images. The selected characteristic parameters were analyzed by MATLAB software, and three analysis methods with higher accuracy were selected. RESULTS: Through prostate cancer identification based on mpMRI images, we found that the system uses 58 texture features and 3 classification algorithms, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), performed well. In the T2WI-based classification results, the SVM achieved the optimal accuracy and AUC values of 64.3% and 0.67. In the DCE-based classification results, the SVM achieved the optimal accuracy and AUC values of 72.2% and 0.77. In the DWI-based classification results, the ensemble learning achieved optimal accuracy as well as AUC values of 75.1% and 0.82. In the classification results based on all data combinations, the SVM achieved the optimal accuracy and AUC values of 66.4% and 0.73. CONCLUSION: The proposed computer-aided diagnosis system provides a good assessment of the diagnosis of the prostate cancer, which may reduce the burden of radiologists and improve the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.
engineering, biomedical,health care sciences & services