Haploidentical transplant for myelodysplastic syndrome: registry-based comparison with identical sibling transplant

Y Wang,H-X Wang,Y-R Lai,Z-M Sun,D-P Wu,M Jiang,D-H Liu,K-L Xu,Q-F Liu,L Liu,J-B Wang,F Gao,J Ou-Yang,S-J Gao,L-P Xu,X-J Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.110
2016-01-01
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Abstract:Encouraging results from a small sample of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing haploidentical donor (HID) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) must be extended. Furthermore, an algorithm derived from a comparison of the outcomes of HID and identical-sibling donor (ISD) HSCT must be established. Therefore, the outcomes of 454 MDS patients who underwent HSCT from HIDs ( n =226) or ISDs ( n =228) between 2003 and 2013 that were reported to the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry were analyzed. Among the 3/6 HID ( n =136), 4–5/6 HID ( n =90) and ISD patient groups, the 4-year adjusted cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality were 34, 29 and 16%, respectively (overall P =0.004), and of relapse were 6, 7 and 10%, respectively (overall P =0.36). The 4-year adjusted probabilities of overall survival were 58, 63 and 73%, respectively (overall P =0.07), and of relapse-free-survival were 58, 63 and 71%, respectively (overall P =0.14); pairwise comparison showed that the difference was only statistically significant in the 3/6 HID vs ISD pair. The data suggest that ISDs remain the best donor source for MDS patients while HIDs (perhaps 4–5/6 HID in particular) could be a valid alternative when an ISD is not available; human leukocyte antigen disparity had no effect on survival among the HID patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?