Evidence for biexponential glutamate T2 relaxation in human visual cortex at 3T: A functional MRS study

Polina Emeliyanova,Laura M. Parkes,Stephen R. Williams,Caroline Lea‐Carnall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.5240
2024-08-29
NMR in Biomedicine
Abstract:We acquire MRS glutamate (Glu) across echo times (TE) between 9.3–280 ms to determine the existence of short‐ and long‐T2 Glu compartments within the brain. We test whether T2‐relaxation parameters change during visual stimulation compared to rest. We observe a short Glu T2‐compartment as predicted (Aim 1), with no significant change in Glu signal during stimulation at any TE (Aim 2). We also show the expected impact of compartmental shift on Glu signal with optimum TE 35 ms (Aim 3). Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) measures dynamic changes in metabolite concentration in response to neural stimulation. The biophysical basis of these changes remains unclear. One hypothesis suggests that an increase or decrease in the glutamate signal detected by fMRS could be due to neurotransmitter movements between cellular compartments with different T2 relaxation times. Previous studies reporting glutamate (Glu) T2 values have generally sampled at echo times (TEs) within the range of 30–450 ms, which is not adequate to observe a component with short T2 (<20 ms). Here, we acquire MRS measurements for Glu, (t) total creatine (tCr) and total N‐acetylaspartate (tNAA) from the visual cortex in 14 healthy participants at a range of TE values between 9.3–280 ms during short blocks (64 s) of flickering checkerboards and rest to examine both the short‐ and long‐T2 components of the curve. We fit monoexponential and biexponential Glu, tCr and tNAA T2 relaxation curves for rest and stimulation and use Akaike information criterion to assess best model fit. We also include power calculations for detection of a 2% shift of Glu between compartments for each TE. Using pooled data over all participants at rest, we observed a short Glu T2‐component with T2 = 10 ms and volume fraction of 0.35, a short tCr T2‐component with T2 = 26 ms and volume fraction of 0.25 and a short tNAA T2‐component around 15 ms with volume fraction of 0.34. No statistically significant change in Glu, tCr and tNAA signal during stimulation was detected at any TE. The volume fractions of short‐T2 component between rest and active conditions were not statistically different. This study provides evidence for a short T2‐component for Glu, tCr and tNAA but no evidence to support the hypothesis of task‐related changes in glutamate distribution between short and long T2 compartments.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,biophysics,spectroscopy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?