Acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Peer-led Hub-and-Spoke Community Aphasia Group program

Miranda L. Rose Cassie Wilcox Michelle Attard John E. Pierce Ciara Shiggins Lucette Lanyon Dana Wong Patricia Fenner Marcella Carragher a School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport,La Trobe University,Melbourne,Australiab Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation,La Trobe University,Melbourne,Australiac School of Psychology and Public Health,La Trobe University,Melbourne,Australia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2024.2410766
2024-10-08
Aphasiology
Abstract:Background Several programs addressing the long-term impacts of aphasia after stroke show promise. However, barriers restrict their implementation at scale. Hub-and-spoke models of care operate in several health contexts to reduce the health care costs associated with health professionals providing all direct services, and to improve the reach of services to communities at distance from the main service. We developed the Peer-led Hub-and-Spoke Community Aphasia Group (Peer-led HS CAG) program to address staff and service availability barriers. The Peer-led HS CAG organises service through a "Hub" of allied and mental health professionals, led by a speech pathologist, who provide consultative and occasional direct services to the aphasia group. The "spokes" are volunteers with and without aphasia, trained and supported by the "Hub" staff to facilitate groups in the community.
clinical neurology,rehabilitation,audiology & speech-language pathology,linguistics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?