High-dose Versus Standard-Dose Daunorubicin in Induction Therapy for Young Patients with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: a Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.

Long Su,Xiaoqing Zhu,Sujun Gao,Wei Li,Xiaoliang Liu,Yehui Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1120009x.2015.1133011
2016-01-01
Journal of Chemotherapy
Abstract:Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose versus standard-dose daunorubicin for young patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) using meta-analysis.Methods: Two trials were taken from 2,481 full-text articles. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-2 index. Quality assessment was performed with the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool.Results: The analysis showed that high-dose daunorubicin induction therapy was associated with higher complete remission (CR) rate (n =965; RR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.36-2.38; p <0.0001; I-2= 0%) and improved overall survival (n=1040; HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.63-0.87; p=0.0003; I-2=0%) compared with standard-dose daunorubicin. However, there was no significant interaction between treatment efficacy and prognostic category based on cytogenetics (favourable, intermediate and unfavourable) (p=0.44,12=0%).Conclusion: High-dose daunorubicin therapy could increase CR rate and improve long-term outcome for young patients with de novo AML. However, further study is needed to identify those who can benefit from high-dose daunorubicin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?