Policy analysis for high-speed rail in China: Evolution, evaluation, and expectation

Hui Li,Xiucheng Dong,Qingzhe Jiang,Kangyin Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.03.019
IF: 6.173
2021-06-01
Transport Policy
Abstract:<p>The success of HSR development can be attributed to strong policy support from the Chinese government, whose policies have various effects on HSR development due to several complex factors. This paper investigates HSR policies launched by the Chinese government based on policy text analysis. To put forward proposals for the development of HSR in China, we trace the evolution of HSR policies, compare the policy tools, and identify the prospects for HSR policy. The main results are as follows: (1) The progress of HSR development in China can be grouped into five major phases: preliminary planning, technology improvement, large-scale construction, stagnation, and going global; (2) based on our policy keywords analysis, we identify the core policy themes of HSR, which include technology development, financial support, engineering projects, and safety system; (3) regulatory policy tools are most often used, followed by information tools and economic tools. Furthermore, we investigate different types of policy tools that can be used in the four HSR policy themes; and (4) this paper proposes that future HSR policy should coordinate with other policies to construct a modern transport system, use integrated policy tools, stimulate demand-side policy, and build a policy system supporting global development.</p>
transportation,economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore the development process of China's high - speed railway (HSR) policies, evaluate the effects of existing policies, and put forward suggestions for future policies. Specifically, through policy text analysis, the paper traces the evolution process of China's high - speed railway policies, compares the application of different policy tools, and identifies the development direction of future high - speed railway policies. The main objectives are as follows: 1. **Trace the evolution of high - speed railway policies**: Divide the development of China's high - speed railway into five main stages: preliminary planning, technological improvement, large - scale construction, stagnation, and going global. Through the analysis of policy keywords, reveal the core content of high - speed railway policy themes and their changes in each development stage. 2. **Summarize the characteristics of high - speed railway policy tools**: Analyze the application of different types of policy tools, including regulatory tools, information tools, and economic tools. By comparing the advantages, disadvantages, and effects of these tools, provide references for the government to formulate effective high - speed railway policies. 3. **Put forward suggestions for high - speed railway policies**: Based on the current policy situation and new directions of efforts, propose that future high - speed railway policies should coordinate with other policies, build a modern transportation system, use comprehensive policy tools, stimulate demand - side policies, and establish a policy system that supports global development. ### Background and significance The development of high - speed railways in China has achieved remarkable achievements, which are mainly attributed to the strong policy support of the Chinese government. However, most of the existing research focuses on the impact of high - speed railways, while relatively little research has been done on high - speed railway policies themselves. Therefore, through systematic bibliometric analysis, this paper fills this research gap, optimizes the high - speed railway policy system, and provides a scientific basis for the development of high - speed railways in China. ### Methods The paper adopts a quantitative analysis method, mainly including the following aspects: 1. **Keyword analysis**: By extracting keywords from policy texts and analyzing the co - occurrence of keywords, reveal the evolution process of policy themes. 2. **Policy effect evaluation**: Through the scoring of policy intensity and policy tools, comprehensively evaluate the policy effect. The formula for calculating the policy effect is as follows: \[ \text{TPE}_i=\sum_{j = 1}^N\sum_{k = 1}^N\text{pe}_{i,j}\times\text{pt}_{i,j,k} \] where \(i\) represents the year, \(\text{TPE}_i\) represents the policy effect in the \(i\) - th year, \(\text{pe}_{i,j}\) represents the score of the \(j\) - th policy in the \(i\) - th year, and \(\text{pt}_{i,j,k}\) represents the score of the \(k\) - th policy tool in the \(j\) - th policy in the \(i\) - th year. 3. **Policy coordination evaluation**: Evaluate the degree of coordination between different policy tools to reflect the efficiency of policy implementation. The formula for calculating the policy coordination degree is as follows: \[ \text{PTC}_{i,j,k,l}=\sum_{j = 1}^N\text{pe}_{i,j}\times\text{pe}_{i,j,k}\times\text{pe}_{i,j,l} \] where \(i\) represents the year, \(\text{PTC}_{i,j,k,l}\) represents the degree of coordination between the \(k\) - th policy tool and the \(l\) - th policy tool in the \(j\) - th policy in the \(i\) - th year, \(\text{pe}_{i,j}\) represents the intensity score of the \(j\) - th policy in the \(i\) - th year, and \(\text{pe}_{i,j,k}\) and \(\text{pe}_{i,j,l}\) respectively represent the scores of the \(k\) - th and \(l\) - th policy tools in the \(j\) - th policy in the \(i\) - th year. ### Data sources The data are sourced from high - speed railway policies issued by the national government between 1990 and 2017. Eventually, 104 publicly - released policy texts were screened out. The processing of policy texts includes keyword extraction, keyword normalization processing, and the use of BibExcel and VOSvi