Development of Community-Level Capacity of Resilience to Natural Hazards for Environmental- and Social-Justice-Challenged Communities: 1. Approach, Concepts, and Assessment of Existing Information

J. Kevin Summers,Rachelle Sanderson,Rachelle Trahan,Kendra Hendricks,Mia Ruffin,Adam Williams,Andrea Lamper,Mason Lowery,Linda C. Harwell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030963
IF: 3.9
2024-01-24
Sustainability
Abstract:Impoverished and under-served communities are often exposed to the worst environmental and climate hazards. Identifying these communities and building their resilience capacity to withstand such hazards is a vital justice aspect of environmental management. Building community resilience requires five activities: (1) examination of existing information, (2) community engagement and assessment of local knowledge, (3) development of reasonable strategies to build resilience, (4) implementation and these strategies, and (5) monitoring and transability of the process. This manuscript examines the first component of this process. The attributes of multiple parishes in Louisiana are examined using available data and existing models of human well-being, community resilience, and environmental/climate/socioeconomic justice. These existing models and tools were used to determine parish-level resilience to natural hazards including flooding, hurricanes, and other potential natural climatic hazards in central Louisiana (U.S.). Through consultation with state officials and local community groups, candidate environmental justice (EJ) and social justice (SJ) communities were selected to develop resilience capacity enhancement plans to address potential adverse parish and community outcomes of natural hazard events. Of the available parishes, St. Helena Parish was selected as an entity that would significantly benefit from resilience capacity building. The remaining two activities, community engagement and strategy development, will be examined in sister manuscripts. Continuing studies, to be described elsewhere, will describe community engagement and the determination of strategies, implementation plans, and the monitoring of the success of these strategic implementations.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to address the issue of community resilience building in environmental and social - justice - challenged communities in the face of natural disasters. Specifically, the paper focuses on how to identify these communities and enhance their resilience capabilities through five activities: 1. **Review of existing information**: Evaluate existing data and models to understand the current situation of the community. 2. **Community participation and local knowledge assessment**: Interact with community members to collect and evaluate local knowledge. 3. **Development of reasonable strategies**: Formulate effective strategies to enhance community resilience. 4. **Implementation of strategies**: Execute these strategies. 5. **Monitoring of the process and transferability assessment**: Monitor the implementation effect of the strategies and evaluate their applicability in other regions. The paper pays special attention to several parishes in central Louisiana, which are threatened by floods, hurricanes and other potential natural and climatic disasters. Through consultations with state government officials and local community groups, the paper selects St. Helena Parish as the key target for enhancing resilience capabilities. This selection is based on the parish's low resilience score, low well - being level and high environmental and social inequality in the existing models. ### Methods The paper adopts a series of evaluation tools and models, including: - **Climate Resilience Screening Index (CRSI)**: Evaluate the community's resilience to natural disasters. - **Human Well - Being Index (HWBI)**: Evaluate the overall well - being level of the community. - **Decision - making Integration for Stronger Communities Tool (DISC)**: Evaluate the community's comprehensive decision - making ability. - **Environmental Justice Screening Tool (EJScreen)**: Evaluate the community's environmental exposure risk. - **Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST)**: Evaluate the community's climate and economic inequality. Through these tools, the paper evaluated 15 target parishes and finally determined four candidate parishes (East Baton Rouge Parish, St. Helena Parish, St. John the Baptist Parish and Washington Parish), which performed the worst in terms of resilience, well - being, environmental exposure and climate - economic inequality. ### Results According to the data in Table 1 and Figure 4, these four parishes all performed poorly in CRSI, HWBI and DISC scores, and showed high environmental exposure risks and high climate - economic inequalities in EJScreen and CEJST scores. Among them, St. Helena Parish was selected as the key target for community participation activities because of its significantly low resilience and low well - being levels. ### Selected parishes 1. **East Baton Rouge Parish**: - Population: 456,781 - Households: 161,536 - Number of families: 95,243 - Area: 470 square miles (1,200 square kilometers) - Water area: 15 square miles (39 square kilometers) - Language: 8.3% of the population speak a language other than English at home - Foreign - born population: 5.7% 2. **St. Helena Parish**: - Population: 10,912 (in 2021) - Geographical features: Pine forests and hills in the north and plains in the south - Economy: Mainly depends on timber, beef, egg production, dairy products and truck farming 3. **St. John the Baptist Parish**: - Population: 42,477 (in 2020) - County seat: Edgard - Largest city: LaPlace - Economy: The oil industry is the main employer, but it also brings some environmental impacts 4. **Washington Parish**: - Population: 48,300 (in 2020) - Geographical features: Located in southeastern Louisiana - Economy: Mainly agriculture and manufacturing Through these evaluations, the paper provides a basis for subsequent community participation and strategy development to enhance the resilience capabilities of these communities in the face of natural disasters.