Proteomic Profile of the Plant-Pathogenic Oomycetephytophthora Capsiciin Response to the Fungicide Pyrimorph
Zhili Pang,Lei Chen,Jianqiang Miao,Zhiwen Wang,Vincent Bulone,Xili Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201400502
2015-01-01
PROTEOMICS
Abstract:PROTEOMICSVolume 15, Issue 17 p. 2972-2982 Research Article Proteomic profile of the plant-pathogenic oomycete Phytophthora capsici in response to the fungicide pyrimorph Zhili Pang, Zhili Pang Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China Division of Glycoscience, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorLei Chen, Lei Chen Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, P. R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJianqiang Miao, Jianqiang Miao Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhiwen Wang, Zhiwen Wang Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorVincent Bulone, Vincent Bulone Division of Glycoscience, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm, Sweden Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, South Australia, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorXili Liu, Corresponding Author Xili Liu Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China Correspondence: Xili Liu, Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing Email: [email protected] Fax: +86-010-62731013Search for more papers by this author Zhili Pang, Zhili Pang Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China Division of Glycoscience, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorLei Chen, Lei Chen Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, P. R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJianqiang Miao, Jianqiang Miao Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhiwen Wang, Zhiwen Wang Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorVincent Bulone, Vincent Bulone Division of Glycoscience, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), AlbaNova University Centre, Stockholm, Sweden Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, South Australia, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorXili Liu, Corresponding Author Xili Liu Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P. R. China Correspondence: Xili Liu, Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing Email: [email protected] Fax: +86-010-62731013Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 April 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201400502Citations: 24 Colour Online: See the article online to view Figs. 1–4 in colour. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Pyrimorph is a novel fungicide from the carboxylic acid amide (CAA) family used to control plant-pathogenic oomycetes such as Phytophthora capsici. The proteomic response of P. capsici to pyrimorph was investigated using the iTRAQ technology to determine the target site of the fungicide and potential biomarker candidates of drug efficacy. A total of 1336 unique proteins were identified from the mycelium of wild-type P. capsici isolate (Hd3) and two pyrimorph-resistant mutants (R3-1 and R3-2) grown in the presence or absence of pyrimorph. Comparative analysis revealed that the three P. capsici isolates Hd3, R3-1, and R3-2 produced 163, 77, and 13 unique proteins, respectively, which exhibited altered levels of abundance in response to the pyrimorph treatment. Further investigations, using Cluster of Orthologous Groups of Proteins (COG) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis identified 35 proteins related to the mode of action of pyrimorph against P. capsici and 62 proteins involved in the stress response of P. capsici to pyrimorph. Many of the proteins with altered expression were associated with glucose and energy metabolism. Biochemical analysis using d-[U-14C]glucose verified the proteomics data, suggesting that the major mode of action of pyrimorph in P. capsici is the inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis. These results also illustrate that proteomics approaches are useful tools for determining the pathways targeted by novel fungicides as well as for evaluating the tolerance of plant pathogens to environmental challenges, such as the presence of fungicides. Supporting Information As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Filename Description pmic12026-sup-0001-SuppMat.zip5.4 MB Supporting information: The iTRAQ isotopic correction coefficients from the manufacturer. Supplementary Figure Percentage of peptide coverage for the identified proteins from the iTRAQ analysis of P. capsici challenged by pyrimorph. The numbers in the pie chart represent the percentage in the respective category Table S4 Differently expressed proteins identified by iTRAQ in R3-2-pyrimorph treated: R3-2-control Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. 5 References 1Leonian, L. H., Stem and fruit blight of peppers caused by Phytophthora capsici sp. nov. Phytopathology 1922, 12, 401–408. 2Duniway, J., Dispersal of Phytophthora capsici and P. parasitica in furrow-irrigated rows of bell pepper, tomato and squash. Plant Pathol. 1995, 44, 1025–1032. 3Enzenbacher, T., Hausbeck, M., An evaluation of cucurbits for susceptibility to cucurbitaceous and solanaceous Phytophthora capsici isolates. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 1404–1414. 4Hausbeck, M. K., Lamour, K. H., Phytophthora capsici on vegetable crops: research progress and management challenges. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 1292–1303. 5Lamour, K. H., Stam R., Jupe J., Huitema E., The oomycete broad-host-range pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 329–337. 6Erwin, D. C., Ribeiro, O. K., Phytophthora diseases worldwide, American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota 1996. 7Gobena, D., Roig, J., Galmarini, C., Hulvey, J., Lamour, K., Genetic diversity of Phytophthora capsici isolates from pepper and pumpkin in Argentina. Mycologia 2012, 104, 102–107. 8Meitz, J. C., Linde, C. C., Thompson, A., Langenhoven, S., McLeod, A., Phytophthora capsici on vegetable hosts in South Africa: distribution, host range and genetic diversity. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2010, 39, 431–439. 9Lamour, K., Kamoun, S., Oomycete genetics and genomics: Diversity, interactions, and research tools, Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ, U.S.A. 2009. 10Quesada-Ocampo, L. M., Granke, L. L., Mercier, M. R., Olsen, J., Hausbeck, M. K., Investigating the genetic structure of Phytophthora capsici populations. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 1061–1073. 11Silvar C., Merino F., Diaz, J., Diversity of Phytophthora capsici in Northwest Spain: Analysis of virulence, metalaxyl response, and molecular characterization. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 1135–1142. 12Keinath, A. P., Sensitivity of populations of Phytophthora capsici from South Carolina to mefenoxam, dimethomorph, zoxamide, and cymoxanil. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 743–748. 13Matheron, M. E., Porchas, M., Impact of azoxystrobin, dimethomorph, fluazinam, fosetyl-Al, and metalaxyl on growth, sporulation, and zoospore cyst germination of three Phytophthora spp. Plant Dis. 2000, 84, 454–458. 14Matheron, M. E., Porchas, M., Comparison of five fungicides on development of root, crown, and fruit rot of chile pepper and recovery of Phytophthora capsici from soil. Plant Dis. 2000, 84, 1038–1043. 15Sun, H., Wang, H., Stammler, G., Ma, J., Zhou, M., Baseline sensitivity of populations of Phytophthora capsici from China to three carboxylic acid amide (CAA) fungicides and sequence analysis of cholinephosphotranferases from a CAA-sensitive isolate and CAA-resistant laboratory mutants. J. Phytopathol. 2010, 158, 244–252. 16 BASF SE, Method for combating harmful fungi, Patent No. US2012083497A1. 17 BASF SE, Method for reducing nitrous oxide emission from soils, Patent No. US2012252668A1. 18Gao, C., Zhang, Q., Fungicidal composition useful for preventing and controlling diseases caused by oomycetes, downy mildew and Phytophthora, comprises pyrimorph and cyazofamid as active ingredients, Patent No. CN101971827-A. 19Qin, Z., Mu, C., Li, N., Fu, B. et al., Agricultural bacteriocide-pyrimorph involves mixing compound with surfactant other assistants and grinding to obtain suspension, frosty mildew of cucumber, blight of hot pepper, proportional mixing compound A with surfactant and grinding, Patent No. CN1939128-A; WO2007137462-A1. 20Yan, X., Qin, W., Sun, L., Qi, S. et al., Study of inhibitory effects and action mechanism of the novel fungicide pyrimorph against Phytophthora capsici. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2009, 58, 2720–2725. 21Xiao, Y. M., Esser, L., Zhou, F., Li, C. et al, Studies on inhibition of respiratory cytochrome bc1 complex by the fungicide pyrimorph suggest a novel inhibitory mechanism. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93765. 22Pennisi, A. M., Agosteo, G. E., Cacciola, S. O., Pane, A., Faedda, R., Insensitivity to metalaxyl among isolates of Phytophthora capsici causing root and crown rot of pepper in southern Italy. Plant Dis. 1998, 82, 1283. 23Lamour, K. H., Mudge, J., Gobena, D., Hurtado-Gonzales, O. P. et al., Genome sequencing and mapping reveal loss of heterozygosity as a mechanism for rapid adaptation in the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 2012, 25, 1350–1360. 24Pang, Z., Shao, J., Chen, L., Lu, X. et al., Resistance to the novel fungicide pyrimorph in Phytophthora capsici: risk assessment and detection of point mutations in CesA3 that confer resistance. PloS ONE 2013, 8, e56513. 25Asif, A. R., Oellerich, M., Amstrong, V. W., Riemenschneider, B. et al., Proteome of conidial surface associated proteins of Aspergillus fumigatus reflecting potential vaccine candidates and allergens. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 954–962. 26Gautam, P., Shankar, J., Madan, T., Sirdeshmukh, R. et al., Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus on exposure to amphotericin B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 4220–4227. 27Kniemeyer, O., Lessing, F., Brakhage, A. A., Proteome analysis for pathogenicity and new diagnostic markers for Aspergillus fumigatus. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, S248–S254. 28Cagas, S. E., Jain, M. R., Li, H., Perlin, D. S., Profiling the Aspergillus fumigatus proteome in response to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 146–154. 29Bradford, M. M., A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. 30Gan, C. S., Chong, P. K., Pham, T. K., Wright, P. C., Technical, experimental, and biological variations in isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 821–827. 31Xu, D., Li, Y., Li, X., Wei, L. L. et al., Serum protein S100A9, SOD3, and MMP9 as new diagnostic biomarkers for pulmonary tuberculosis by iTRAQ-coupled two-dimensional LC-MS/MS. Proteomics 2015, 15, 58–67. 32Moulder, R., Lönnberg, T., Elo, L. L., Filén, J. J., Rainio, E. et al., Quantitative proteomics analysis of the nuclear fraction of human CD4+ cells in the early phases of IL-4-induced Th2 differentiation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 1937–1953. 33Michalski, A., Damoc, E., Hauschild, J. P., Lange, O. et al., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Q Exactive, a high-performance benchtop quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, M111.011015. 34Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J., Williamson, B. et al., Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154–1169. 35Liu, J., Chen, L., Wang, J., Qiao, J., Zhang, W., Proteomic analysis reveals resistance mechanism against biofuel hexane in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5, 68. 36Ye, J., Fang, L., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y. et al., WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W293–297. 37Mélida H., Sandoval-Sierra J. V., Diéguez-Uribeondo J., Bulone V., Analyses of extracellular carbohydrates in oomycetes unveil the existence of three different cell wall types. Eukaryot Cell 2013, 12, 194–203. 38Updegraff, D. M., Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal. Biochem. 1969, 32, 420–424. 39Meinert, M. C., Delmer, D. P., Changes in biochemical composition of the cell wall of the cotton fiber during development. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 1088–1097. 40Evans, C., Noirel, J., Ow, S. Y., Salim, M. et al., An insight into iTRAQ: where do we stand now? Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012 404, 1011–1027. 41Unwin, R. D., Griffiths, J. R., Whetton, A. D., Simultaneous analysis of relative protein expression levels across multiple samples using iTRAQ isobaric tags with 2D nano LC-MS/MS. Nat. Prot. 2010, 5, 1574–1582. 42Ong, S. E., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Bio. 2005, 1, 252–262. 43Haas, B. J., Kamoun, S., Zody, M. C., Jiang, R. H. et al., Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature 2009, 461, 393–398. 44Zerillo, M. M., Adhikari, B. N., Hamilton, J. P., Buell, C. R. et al., Carbohydrate-active enzymes in Pythium and their role in plant cell wall and storage polysaccharide degradation. PloS ONE 2013, 8, e72572. 45Pocalyko, D. J., Carroll, L. J., Martin, B. M., Babbitt, P. C. et al., Analysis of sequence homologies in plant and bacterial pyruvate phosphate dikinase, enzyme I of the bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system and other PEP-utilizing enzymes. Identification of potential catalytic and regulatory motifs. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 10757–10765. 46Evans, H. J., Wood, H. G., The mechanism of the pyruvate, phosphate dikinase reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1968, 61, 1448. 47Kinosita, K., Yasuda, R., Noji, H., F1-ATPase: a highly efficient rotary ATP machine. Essays Biochem. 2000, 35, 3–18. 48Leyva, J. A., Bianchet, M. A., Amzel, L. M., Understanding ATP synthesis: structure and mechanism of the F1-ATPase. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2003, 20, 27–33. 49Elston, T., Wang, H., Oster, G., Energy transduction in ATP synthase. Nature 1998, 391, 510–513. 50Wang, H., Oster, G., Energy transduction in the F1 motor of ATP synthase. Nature 1998, 396, 279–282. 51Tyler, B. M., Tripathy, S., Zhang, X., Dehal, P. et al., Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science 2006, 313, 1261–1266. 52Knudsen, J., Burton, M., Faergeman, N., Long chain acyl-CoA esters and acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP) in cell function. Adv. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 33, 123–152. 53Nelson, D. L., Cox, M. M., Lehninger principles of biochemistry, Worth Publishers, New York 2000, pp. 628-631, 634, 828–830. 54Rouxel, M., Papura, D., Nogueira, M., Machefer, V. et al., Microsatellite markers for characterization of native and introduced populations of Plasmopara viticola, the causal agent of grapevine downy mildew. Appl. Environ. Microbio. 2012, 78, 6337–6340. 55Grenville-Briggs, L. J., Avrova, A. O., Bruce, C. R., Williams, A. et al., Elevated amino acid biosynthesis in Phytophthora infestans during appressorium formation and potato infection. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 244–256. 56Baldauf, S. L., Doolittle, W. F., Origin and evolution of the slime molds (Mycetozoa). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1997, 94, 12007–12012. 57van't Klooster, J. W., vanden Berg-Velthuis, G., vanWest, P., Govers, F., tef1, a Phytophthora infestans gene encoding translation elongation factor 1α;. Gene 2000, 249, 145–151. 58Santos, P. M., Simões, T., Sá-Correia, I., Insights into yeast adaptive response to the agricultural fungicide mancozeb: a toxicoproteomics approach. Proteomics 2009, 9, 657–670. 59Gasch, A. P., Werner-Washburne, M., The genomics of yeast responses to environmental stress and starvation. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2002, 2, 181–192. 60Marchitti, S. A., Brocker, C., Stagos, D., Vasiliou V., Non-P450 aldehyde oxidizing enzymes: the aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily. Expert Opin. Drug Metab.Toxicol. 2008, 4, 697–720. 61Jitrapakdee, S., St Maurice, M., Rayment, I., Cleland, W. W. et al., Structure, mechanism and regulation of pyruvate carboxylase. Biochem. J. 2008, 413, 369–387. 62Minarik, P., Tomaskova, N., Kollarova, M., Antalik, M., Malate dehydrogenases-structure and function. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2002, 21, 257–266. 63Ingram-Smith, C., Martin, S. R., Smith, K. S., Acetate kinase: not just a bacterial enzyme. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 249–253. 64Luard E. J., Activity of isocitrate dehydrogenase from three filamentous fungi in relation to osmotic and solute effects. Arch Microbiol. 1983, 134, 233–237. 65Stadtman, E. R., The purification and properties of phosphotransacetylase. J. Biol. Chem. 1952, 196, 527–534. 66Wohlrab, H., Molecular aspects of inorganic phosphate transport in mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1986, 853, 115–134. 67Bose, S., French, S., Evans, F. J., Joubert, F., Balaban, R. S., Metabolic network control of oxidative phosphorylation multiple roles of inorganic phosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 39155–39165. 68Michelet, B., Boutry, M. The plasma membrane H+-ATPase (a highly regulated enzyme with multiple physiological functions). Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 1. 69Blum, M., Boehler, M., Randall, E., Young, V., Csukai, M. et al., Mandipropamid targets the cellulose synthase-like PiCesA3 to inhibit cell wall biosynthesis in the oomycete plant pathogen, Phytophthora infestans. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 11, 227–243. Citing Literature Volume15, Issue17September 2015Pages 2972-2982 ReferencesRelatedInformation