Waiting for the Barbarians: Allegory of Allegories

Teresa Dovey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24311-2_8
1996-01-01
Abstract:Much of the critical discussion on Waiting for the Barbarians focuses on its status as allegory.1 It seems useful to clarify the various constructions of allegory being brought to bear in these discussions, to explore the modes of allegory exemplified in the novel, and to posit a reason for its importance in Waiting for the Barbarians in particular, when all of Coetzee’s novels can, in some sense, be regarded as allegorical. Some critics validate Coetzee’s choice of the mode, seeing it as a way of telling the truth in a context where oppressive censorship would prevent explicit representation of actual events (Zamora, Wade), while others have taken Coetzee to task for what they perceive to be a form of ahistorical universalism. Nadine Gordimer, for example, sees Coetzee’s use of allegory as ‘a stately fastidiousness; or a state of shock’. Thus she says: ‘He seemed able to deal with the horror he saw written on the sun only — if brilliantly — if this were to be projected into another time and plane’ (‘The Idea of Gardening’ 3).2
What problem does this paper attempt to address?