Abstract:Background and aims Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been increasingly applied in the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (G-SMTs) with explorative intention. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and clinical outcomes of EFTR and surgical intervention for the management of muscularis propria (MP)-derived G-SMTs. Methods Between September 2011 and May 2019, the clinical records of patients with MP-derived G-SMTs undergoing EFTR at our endoscopic unit were collected. A cohort of people with primary MP-derived G-SMTs treated by surgery was matched in a 1:1 ratio to EFTR group with regard to patients’ baseline characteristics, clinicopathologic features of the tumor and the procedure date. The perioperative outcomes and follow-up data were analyzed. Results In total, 62 and 62 patients were enrolled into the surgery and EFTR group, respectively, with median follow-up of 786 days. The size of G-SMTs (with ulceration) ranged from 10 to 90 mm. For patients with tumor smaller than 30 mm, surgery and EFTR group presented comparable procedural success rate (both were 100%), en bloc resection rate (100% vs. 94.7%), tumor capsule rupture rate (0% vs. 5.3%), and pathological R0 resection rate (both were 100%). EFTR had a statistically significant advantage over surgery for estimated blood loss (3.12 ± 5.20 vs. 46.97 ± 60.73 ml, p ≤ 0.001), discrepancy between the pre- and postprocedural hemoglobin level (5.18 ± 5.43 vs. 9.84 ± 8.25 g/L, p = 0.005), bowel function restoration [1 (0–5) vs. 3 (1–5) days, p ≤ 0.001], and hospital cost (28,617.09 ± 6720.78 vs. 33,963.10 ± 13,454.52 Yuan, p = 0.033). The patients with tumor larger than 30 mm showed roughly the same outcomes after comparison analysis of the two groups. However, the clinical data revealed lower en bloc resection rate (75.0% vs. 100%, p = 0.022) and higher tumor capsule rupture rate (25.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.022) for EFTR when compared to surgery. The procedure time, duration of postprocedural fasting and antibiotics usage, and hospital stay of the two groups were equivalent. The occurrence rate of adverse events within postoperative day 7 were 74.2% and 72.6% after EFTR and surgery, respectively ( p = 1.000). No complications occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion For treatment of MP-derived G-SMTs (with or without ulceration), our study showed the feasibility and safety of EFTR, which also provided better results in terms of procedural blood loss, the postoperative bowel function restoration and cost-effectiveness when compared to surgery, whereas the surgery was superior in en bloc resection rate for G-SMTs larger than 30 mm. The postprocedural clinical outcomes seemed to be equivalent in these two resection methods.

Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection (EFTR) for Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors

Endoscopic Full‐thickness Resection for Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors

Resection of the Gastric Submucosal Tumor (G-SMT) Originating from the Muscularis Propria Layer: Comparison of Efficacy, Patients' Tolerability, and Clinical Outcomes Between Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection and Surgical Resection

Endoscopic Full‐thickness Resection, Indication, Methods and Perspectives

A Real-World Promising Result of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection: It's Time for Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection to Be Widely Used.

A Real-World Promising Result of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection: It's Time for Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection to Be Widely Used

Endoscopic full thickness resection: techniques, applications, outcomes

Safety and efficacy of a modified endoscopic full-thickness resection technique for gastric submucosal tumors: a case series

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic full‐thickness resection for submucosal tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract, including predominantly extraluminal submucosal tumors (with video)

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (EFTR) Without Laparoscopic Assistance for Nonampullary Duodenal Subepithelial Lesions: Our Clinical Experience of 32 Cases

Effects Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection in Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Tumor

Endoscopic full-thickness resection: circumferential cutting method

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection with Double-Layer Closure by Endoscopic Hand Suturing for a Gastric Subepithelial Tumor

Effect of endoscopic full-thickness resection assisted by distal serosal turnover with floss traction for gastric submucosal masses

The Efficacy of Full-Thickness Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors in the Gastric Cardia.

Feasibility of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Submucosal Tumors

Colon Sparing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Advanced Colorectal Lesions: Is It Time for Global Adoption?

Mo1977 Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection for Non-Ampullary Duodenal Submucosal Tumors

The Efficacy of Dental Floss and a Hemoclip As a Traction Method for the Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of Submucosal Tumors in the Gastric Fundus.

Triangular pulley traction facilitates endoscopic full-thickness resection of exogenous gastric tumor in the fornix of the stomach

Submucosal Tunnel Endoscopic Resection for Extraluminal Tumors: a Novel Endoscopic Method for En Bloc Resection of Predominant Extraluminal Growing Subepithelial Tumors or Extra-Gastrointestinal Tumors (with Videos)