Abstract:Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition in older adults, being identified as a cause of disability in this population. Despite ir validity and reliability, the functional capacity tests are not often administered in patients with LBP but provide useful information related to mobility. A measurement property of the functional capacity tests that has not been investigated extensively in the LBP field is the resiveness, such as the capacity to detect changes during the intervention. Objectives To determine the responsiveness of three functional capacity tests, the Timed Up and Go test, the 4-meter Walk test, the 5 times Sit to Stand test, and to compare with the responsiveness of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in older adults with chronic LBP undergoing an 8-week intervention. Methods This is a responsiveness study with measurement before and after an 8-week intervention. It was prospectively registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (RBR-9prhzng). Patients with nonspecific LBP (age ≥60) were recruited. The functional capacity tests and the RMDQ were administered at baseline and after 8 weeks. The intervention followed the recommendations from clinical practice guidelines for the management of nonspecific LBP: The responsiveness was determined by calculating the effect size (ES), correlation analysis, and the analysis of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Results 118 older adults with chronic LBP were recruited. The RMDQ was the most responsiveness measure, followed by the Sit to Stand test. The ES for the RMDQ was large (ES= -0,74; 95%IC: -0,56; -0,92), whereas the 5 Times Sit to Stand test presented a small effect (EF= -0,45, 95%CI: - 0,26; -0,64). The Timed UP and Go test and the 4-meter Walk test small ESs (ES< 0,25). The 5 Times Sit to Stand test was the only one to show a fair correlation (0,25 < r <0,50) with RMDQ. The ROC analysis, only the RMDQ showed AUC values above the cut-off point of 0,70. Conclusion The RMDQ was responsive to an 8-week lumbar stabilization program in older adults with chronic LBP. The 5 Times Sit to Stand test was the most responsive but presented limitations with regard to the capacity to discriminate patients who recovered from those who did not recover. A possible explanation for the lack of responsiveness foto the tests may be due to the nature of the intervention, which was not focused on increasing ability and balance, components that are necessarily assessed by functional capacity tests. Implications Functional capacity tests are widely used to assess mobility and balance in older adults. Only the 5 Times Sit to Stand test was considered to able to detect changes in older adults who underwent an 8-week intervention program. The RMDQ was more responsive than any of the functional capacity tests.

Responsiveness of Outcome Measurements in Rehabilitation of Patients With Posterior Pelvic Pain Since Pregnancy

Psychometric Properties of Patient-reported Outcome Measures to Assess Resilience in Individuals with Musculoskeletal Pain or Rheumatic Conditions: A COSMIN-based Systematic Review

FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY AND DISABILITY IN OLDER ADULTS WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A STUDY OF RESPONSIVENESS

Which general functional outcome measure does a better job of capturing change in clinical status in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients? An analysis of responsiveness over the first year of recovery

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults with Low Back Pain?

Measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score in patients with chronic low back pain

Assessing the measurement properties of PROMIS Computer Adaptive Tests, short forms and legacy patient reported outcome measures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review

Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain

[Application Analysis of Patient Reported Outcome Scale for Low Back and Leg Pain].

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Randomized Controlled Trials Following Surgical Intervention for Endometriosis: A Structured Review from the AAGL Practice Guidelines Group

Responsiveness of Subjective and Objective Measures of Pain and Function Following Operative Interventions for Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Narrative Review

Physical functioning in the lumbar spinal surgery population: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of outcome measures and measurement properties of the physical measures

Group intervention for women with pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial

Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review Using the COnsensus‐Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Checklist

Clinical value of questionnaires & physical tests for patellofemoral pain: Validity, reliability and predictive capacity

Assessment of pelvic floor and abdominal muscles three months postpartum: A reliability study

Do baseline patient reported outcome measures predict changes in self-reported function, following a chronic pain rehabilitation programme?

Recommended measurement instruments for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause: the COMMA (Core outcomes in menopause) consortium

Practicable performance-based outcome measures of trunk muscle strength and their measurement properties: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Responsiveness and sensitivity of PROMs to change in disease activity status in early and established rheumatoid arthritis