Łukasz Jan Orman,Natalia Siwczuk,Norbert Radek,Stanislav Honus,Jerzy Zbigniew Piotrowski,Luiza Dębska
Abstract:This paper experimentally analyses an indoor environment assessment of a large group of respondents regarding their subjective perception of overall comfort, indoor air quality and humidity. The questionnaire survey was applied as a testing method together with measurements of the physical parameters conducted with a microclimate meter. Two types of environment were analysed: educational rooms and the climate chamber. The comparative analysis of the sensations experienced within them indicates that they generate quite similar responses; however, some discrepancies have been identified. The overall comfort of the climate chamber was typically assessed as being higher than that of the educational rooms at the same air temperature. The most favourable air temperature in the climate chamber was ca. 20.7 °C, while in the educational rooms it was ca. 22.3 °C. The most preferable conditions in the climate chamber occurred at a thermal sensation vote of −0.4 ("pleasantly slightly cool"), while in the educational rooms it occurred at +0.2 ("neutral/pleasantly slightly warm"). Quite strong correlations between overall comfort and indoor air quality as well as between humidity assessment and humidity preference votes were observed, which did not seem to depend on the type of environment. These findings are important because results from the simulated conditions are often used in the analyses of actual living/working environments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the differences and consistency in people's subjective evaluations of indoor environments under real room and simulated conditions (climate chamber). Specifically, the study aims to compare people's perceptions of overall comfort, indoor air quality, and humidity in the two environments and explore whether these perceptions can be interchangeable, thereby validating the applicability of climate chamber experimental data in the design of actual building environments.
### Research Background
1. **Energy Consumption and Indoor Environment**:
- The construction industry is a major part of global energy consumption, with heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems accounting for 30% of the total energy consumption.
- People spend up to 90% of their time indoors, thus the demand for indoor environmental quality is increasing.
2. **Influencing Factors**:
- Indoor environment evaluation is influenced by various physical parameters such as temperature, humidity, air flow, and carbon dioxide concentration.
- Personal background, age, gender, and other factors also affect people's perception of the indoor environment.
3. **Existing Research**:
- Existing studies are mainly conducted in actual buildings or climate chambers, but few studies directly compare the results in these two environments.
- There is still controversy over whether climate chamber experimental data can accurately reflect the situation in actual buildings.
### Research Objectives
- **Comparison of Subjective Evaluations in Two Environments**: Through questionnaires and physical parameter measurements, compare people's perceptions of overall comfort, indoor air quality, and humidity in actual educational rooms and climate chambers.
- **Validation of Climate Chamber Data Applicability**: Explore whether climate chamber experimental data can be used for the design and evaluation of actual buildings.
### Research Methods
- **Experimental Sites**: The study was conducted in actual educational rooms in five teaching buildings at Kielce University of Technology in Poland and in a climate chamber.
- **Data Collection**:
- Use microclimate instruments to record air temperature, globe temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide concentration.
- Distribute anonymous questionnaires to collect participants' subjective evaluations of the indoor environment.
- **Sample Characteristics**:
- A total of 1302 questionnaires were collected in actual educational rooms, and 480 questionnaires were collected in the climate chamber.
- Participants were mainly students, with an average age between 22-26 years, and similar BMI values.
- Clothing thermal insulation values ranged from 0.59 to 0.65, with a nearly equal gender ratio.
### Results and Discussion
- **Physical Parameters**:
- The air temperature range in educational rooms was 20.0-29.7°C, and in the climate chamber, it was 19.0-28.3°C.
- Relative humidity in educational rooms was 19.7-65.8%, and in the climate chamber, it was 18.6-74.3%.
- **Subjective Evaluations**:
- The evaluation results of overall comfort showed that the overall comfort in the climate chamber was generally rated higher.
- The optimal air temperature was 20.7°C in the climate chamber and 22.3°C in educational rooms.
- In the climate chamber, the most comfortable thermal sensation vote was -0.4 ("pleasantly slightly cool"), while in educational rooms, it was +0.2 ("neutral/pleasantly slightly warm").
- There was a strong correlation between overall comfort and evaluations of indoor air quality and humidity, and this correlation was independent of the environment type.
### Conclusion
- **Main Findings**:
- Although there are some differences in the overall comfort evaluations in the two environments, they show similar responses in many aspects.
- Climate chamber experimental data can be used to some extent for the design and evaluation of actual building environments, but attention should be paid to individual differences and environmental characteristics.
- **Research Significance**:
- This study fills the gap in the comparison of evaluation data between real room and climate chamber environments, providing important reference for indoor environment design.