Abstract:Background Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for moving targets is known to be impacted by interplay effects between the scanning beam and organ motion. While respiratory motion in the thoracic region is the major cause for organ motion, interplay effects depend on the delivery characteristics of proton accelerators. Purpose To evaluate the impact of different types of PBS proton accelerators and spot sizes on interplay effects, mitigations, and plan quality for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Twenty NSCLC patients treated with photon SBRT were selected to represent varying tumor volumes and respiratory motion amplitudes (median: 0.6 cm with abdominal compression) for this retrospective study. For each patient, plans were created using: (1) cyclotron‐generated proton beams (CPB) with spot sizes of σ = 2.7–7.0 mm; (2) linear accelerator proton beams (LPB) (σ = 2.9–5.5 mm); and (3) linear accelerator proton minibeams (LPMB) (σ = 0.9–3.9 mm). The energy switching time is one second for CPB, and 0.005 s for LPMB and LPB. Plans were robustly optimized on the gross tumor volume (GTV) using each individual phase of four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans. Initially, single‐field optimization (SFO) plans were evaluated; if the plan quality did not meet the dosimetric requirement, multi‐field optimization (MFO) was used. MFO plans were created for all patients for comparisons. For each patient, all plans were normalized to have the same dose received by 99% of the GTV. Interplay effects were evaluated by computing the dose on 10 breathing phases, based on the spot distribution. Volumetric repainting (VR) was performed 2–6 times for each plan. We compared volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100%RX) of the GTV, and normal lung V20Gy. Results Twelve of 20 plans can be optimized sufficiently with SFO. SFO plans were less sensitive to the interplay effect compared to MFO plans in terms of target coverage for both LPB and LPMB. The following comparisons showed results utilizing the MFO technique. In the interplay evaluation without repainting, the mean V100%RX of the GTV were 99.42 ± 0.6%, 97.52 ± 3.9%, and 94.49 ± 7.3% for CPB, LPB, and LPMB plans, respectively. Following VR (2 × for CPB; 3 × for LPB; 5 × for LPMB), V100%RX of the GTV were improved (on average) by 0.13%, 1.84%, and 4.63%, respectively, achieving the acceptance criteria of V100%RX > 95%. Because of fast energy switch in linear accelerator proton machines, the delivery time for VR plans was the lowest for LPB plans, while delivery time for LPMB was on average 1 min longer than CPB plans. The advantage of small spot machines was better sparing in normal lung V20Gy, even when VR was applied. Conclusion In the absence of repainting, proton machines with large spot sizes generated more robust plans against interplay effects. The number of VR increased with decreasing spot sizes to achieve the acceptance criteria. VR improved the plan robustness against interplay effects for modalities with small spot sizes and fast energy changes, preserving the low dose sparing aspect of the LPMB, even when motion is included.

Search for practical scaling factors of Bragg peak arrangement for line-scanning proton beam therapy in RayStation

Cyclotron and linear accelerator generated scanning proton beams for lung cancer SBRT: Interplay effects and mitigations

Beam specific planning target volumes incorporating 4DCT for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of thoracic tumors

Mixed-size spot scanning with a compact large momentum acceptance superconducting (LMA-SC) gantry beamline for proton therapy

Creating uniform cluster dose spread‐out Bragg peaks for proton and carbon beams

A novel treatment planning method via scissor beams for uniform-target-dose proton GRID with peak-valley-dose-ratio optimization

A novel planning framework for efficient spot-scanning proton arc therapy via particle swarm optimization (SPArc-particle swarm)

Dose calculation for spot scanning proton therapy with the application of a range shifter

Exploring the Advantages of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy: Experimental Validation of Biological Effects Using Two Different Beam Intensity-Modulation Patterns

Feasibility Study of Hybrid Inverse Planning with Transmission Beams and Single-energy Spread-out Bragg Peaks for Proton Flash Radiotherapy

Feasibility and constraints of Bragg peak FLASH proton therapy treatment planning

Effects of spot size errors in DynamicARC pencil beam scanning proton therapy planning

Developing an accurate model of spot-scanning treatment delivery time and sequence for a compact superconducting synchrocyclotron proton therapy system

Explore the feasibility of using spot-scanning proton arc therapy for a synchrotron accelerator-based proton therapy system - A simulation study

Jump stochastic differential equations for the characterisation of the Bragg peak in proton beam radiotherapy

Technical note: Dosimetry and FLASH potential of UHDR proton PBS for small lung tumors: Bragg‐peak‐based delivery versus transmission beam and IMPT

Proton FLASH: Passive Scattering or Pencil Beam Scanning?

An improved beam splitting method for intensity modulated proton therapy

A systematic study of independently-tuned room-specific PBS beam model in a beam-matched multiroom proton therapy system

Optimization of pencil beam scanning pattern for FLASH proton therapy

Voxel-wise dose rate calculation in clinical pencil beam scanning proton therapy