Feasibility of Minimising Motorised Traffic Interaction As an Air Pollution Exposure Risk Management Strategy for Bicycle Commuters

Thomas Cole-Hunter,Lidia Morawska,Ian Stewart,Rohan Jayaratne,Colin Solomon
IF: 24.3
2012-01-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Bicycle commuting in an urban environment of poor air quality has been demonstrated as a potential cardiopulmonary health risk for susceptible participants; however, limited studies have assessed the feasibility of risk management strategies. The potential of minimising motorised traffic interaction during bicycle commuting to reduce ultrafine particle (UFP; < 0.1 µm, main particle diameter range) exposure was investigated using air quality measurements and acute health endpoints in healthy individuals. Thirty-five healthy adults (n = 35; mean ± SD age = 39 ± 11 yr; 29% female) rode two return trips of pre-determined minimal (MIN) and maximal (MAX) motorised traffic interaction variations of their typical bicycle commute route. Particle number concentration (PNC) and diameter were collected in-commute, along with ambient air quality data from fixed monitoring sites. Health endpoints including acute respiratory symptoms, lung function and spontaneous sputum were collected immediately pre-commute, and then one and four hours post-commute. MIN facilitated a significant reduction in mean PNC (1.91 x e4 vs 2.95 x e4 ppcc; p = 0.01) compared to MAX. Besides incidence of in-commute offensive odour detection (42.4 vs 55.8 %; p = 0.03) and nasopharyngeal irritation (31.2 v. 40.9 %; p = 0.04), health endpoints were not significantly associated to air quality measures, nor were reduced with MIN compared to MAX. Acute health detriment from in-commute air pollution exposure is not indicated in healthy bicycle commuters; however, susceptible participants may benefit from a significantly reduced PNC associated with minimising motorised traffic proximity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?