Abstract:As an important method for uncertainty modeling, Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory has been widely applied in practical applications. However, the counter-intuitive results are often generated when fusing different sources of highly conflicting evidence with Dempster's combination rule. Several different methods for measuring the evidence conflict have been proposed. Nevertheless, these methods showed focus only on a single criterion to measure the conflicting evidence. Mono-criteria factor for the measurement of the conflict between evidence is, however, often unreliable and inaccuracy. Because various factors affect the degree of conflict between the evidence, such as imperfection, dissimilarity, disparity, and uncertainty. To address this issue, multiple criteria factors are utilized to measure the degree of conflict between the evidence in this paper. An improved analytic hierarchy process is proposed to determine the weights of each body of evidence by considering multiple criteria. Firstly, calculating the quantitative value of the evaluation index of each evidence under every criterion. The covariance matrix of the criterion layer is determined based on the covariance between the quantitative values of each criterion. Then, the pairwise comparison matrix of the criterion layer can be obtained by transforming the covariance matrix. Next, the variance among the quantitative values of each criterion is applied to construct the fuzzy preference relation matrix. The fuzzy preference relation matrix is used to replace the pairwise comparison matrix of the scheme layer. After that, the weight of the criterion layer and the scheme layer are combined to acquire the final weights of each evidence. Finally, the original evidence is modified with the final weights of the evidence before using Dempster's combination rule. Two numerical experiments are given to verify the efficiency of the proposed approach. The result shows that the proposed method is more efficient and feasible in managing the conflicting evidence than other approaches available in the literature described.

Combining Sources of Evidence with Reliability and Importance for Decision Making

Combination of Sources of Evidence with Different Discounting Factors Based on a New Dissimilarity Measure

An Adaptive Evidence Combination Method for Decision Analysis under Uncertainty

Dependent Evidence Combination Based on Decision‐making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Method

An Evidence Combination Approach Based on Fuzzy Discounting

A novel multi-criteria conflict evidence combination method and its application to pattern recognition

A new method of information decision-making based on D-S evidence theory

Combination approach for conflicting evidence based on discount coefficient

Conflicting evidence combination based on evidence distance and weighted balance evidence theory

Handling of Dependence in Dempster-Shafer Theory.

Combination of Evidence with Different Weighting Factors: A Novel Probabilistic-Based Dissimilarity Measure Approach

A Novel Combination Method for Conflicting Evidence Based on Inconsistent Measurements.

Conflicting evidence combination of interval-valued belief structures

A dicscounting approach to evidence conflict management

Multi-Sensor Data Fusion Based on Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process

Combining Conflicting Evidence Using the DEMATEL Method

Weighted Evidence Combination Based on Distance of Evidence and Uncertainty Measure

A New Weighting Factor in Combining Belief Function.

Discounted Combination of Unreliable Evidence Using Degree of Disagreement.

On the Combination and Normalization of Conflicting Interval-Valued Belief Structures

Evidence Combination Based on Prospect Theory for Multi-Sensor Data Fusion