Abstract:Urban arterials form the main structure of city street networks, and typically have high traffic volume and high crash frequency. To reduce the number of crashes, hotspot identification (HSID) is the first step in the traffic safety management process, and often utilizes crash prediction models. Classical crash prediction models investigate the relationship between roadway characteristics and traffic safety at the micro level, that is, they treat road segments and intersections as isolated units. Micro-level analysis has limitations, however, when examining urban arterial crashes: 1) signal spacing is typically short for urban arterials in dense street networks, and there are interactions between intersections and road segments that classical models do not accommodate; and 2) for practical engineering, a hotspot to which countermeasures are applied generally consists of several adjacent intersections and road segments instead of a single intersection or road segment. To address these concerns, signalized intersections and their adjacent road segments were combined into meso-level units, which were adopted to investigate traffic safety data from 21 urban arterials in Shanghai, China. To determine if the meso-level unit is the most suitable research unit for identifying hotspots on urban arterials, and if so, which HSID method can most consistently identify them, this study identified micro-level (separate intersection and road segment) and meso-level (combined intersection and road segment) hotspots using crash frequency, empirical Bayesian (EB), potential for safety improvement (PSI), and full Bayesian (FB) methods. To evaluate the performance of the HSID methods, hotspot consistency over two years was tested. The results showed 1) that EB and PSI performed better than the other methods no matter which research unit was used; 2) substantial inconsistency between the identified micro- and meso-level hotspots. To identify both hazardous corridors and individual intersections and road segments on urban arterials, a combination of micro- and meso-level hotspots should be recommended to local transportation authorities.

A Note on Hotspot Identification For Urban Expressways

Hotspot identification considering daily variability of traffic flow and crash record: A case study

Traffic State and Emission Estimation for Urban Expressways Based on Heterogeneous Data

Hotspot identification on urban arterials at the meso level

An Extended Generalized Filter Algorithm for Urban Expressway Traffic Time Estimation Based on Heterogeneous Data

Experimental evaluation of hotspot identification methods

Identification of Spillovers in Urban Street Networks Based on Upstream Fixed Traffic Data

Safety Evaluation for Expressways: A Comparative Study for Macroscopic and Microscopic Indicators

Potential crash risks of expressway on-ramps and off-ramps: A case study in Beijing, China

A data‐driven adaptive geospatial hotspot detection approach in smart cities

Identifying Critical Congestion Hotspots Using Network Approach: Smart Spatial Placement of Sensors

On-ramp Metering on Beijing Urban Expressway

Spatial multiresolution analysis approach to identify crash hotspots and estimate crash risk

Network space analysis–based identification of road traffic accident hotspots: a case study

Urban Road Network Emergency: An Integrative Vulnerability Identification Method

Expressway Bottleneck Pattern Identification Using Traffic Big Data—the Case of Ring Roads in Beijing, China

Hotspots Analysis Using Cyber-Physical-Social System for a Smart City

Comparative Evaluation of Crash Hotspot Identification Methods: Empirical Bayes vs. Potential for Safety Improvement Using Variants of Negative Binomial Models

Analysis of safety factors for urban expressways considering the effect of congestion in Shanghai, China

Societal risk assessment of transportation networks under uncertainties due to climate change and population growth

Real-time safety analysis for expressways considering the heterogeneity of different segment types