Passive Cross Holding As a Strategic Entry Deterrence

Sanxi Li,Hongkun Ma,Chenhang Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.06.006

IF: 1.469

2015-01-01

Economics Letters

Abstract:This paper builds a duopoly model to study the strategic effects of cross holding on entry deterrence. We show that, in equilibrium, the incumbent optimally chooses strictly positive cross holdings in each other to deter entry for the potential entrant.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Passive cross‐holdings, horizontal differentiation, and welfare

Jing Fang,Jingyi Huang,Chenhang Zeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12436

2024-01-10

Bulletin of Economic Research

Abstract:We study how passive cross‐holdings affect product differentiation and welfare in a Cournot duopoly. We show that increasing unilateral ownership stimulates total investments, and therefore improves social welfare. Such cross‐holdings should not be controlled in view of social welfare. However, we identify an inverted‐U (a negative) relationship between consumer surplus and ownership when the demand is small (large). Then a government might apply intervention thresholds for passive ownership if it uses consumer surplus as the appropriate standard for antitrust enforcement. We further consider symmetric bilateral cross‐holdings and show that our results are in general robust, but increasing ownership will generate more serious competition harms than unilateral cross‐holdings. Thus, special concerns need to be given to bilateral cross‐holdings.

economics
Open or Closed? Technology Sharing, Supplier Investment, and Competition

Bin Hu,Ming Hu,Yi Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0598

2017-01-01

Abstract:Competing technologies in emerging industries create uncertainties that discourage supplier investments. Open technology can induce supplier investments, but may also lead to intensified future competition. In this paper, we study competing manufacturers’ open-technology strategies. We show that despite the risk of intensifying future competition, open technologies by competing manufacturers may constitute an equilibrium and can indeed induce supplier investments. In addition, we identify a technology-risk-pooling benefit; namely, by opening technologies, competing manufacturers can induce supplier investments in both technologies and later adopt the one preferred by the market. However, manufacturers may also exhibit the prisoner’s dilemma and close their technologies despite the risk-pooling benefit. In this case, there is potential for collaborative technology sharing through cross licensing. Finally, we show that manufacturers may sometimes close their technologies to force supplier investments.
Platform entry and homing as competitive strategies under cross-sided network effects

Cheng-Han Wu,Netnapha Chamnisampan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113428

IF: 6.969

2021-01-01

Decision Support Systems

Abstract:<p>In a competitive environment, determining when to enter the market and what homing policies should be adopted are crucial strategic decisions for platform-based businesses. In this study, we investigate the interactions between two platforms competing in two-sided markets with cross-sided network effects and determine their prices under different entry and homing strategies. We derive the equilibrium demands of two-sided markets for platforms and the equilibrium prices for two competing platforms. We further conduct a comparative analysis among scenarios with different combinations of homing and entry strategies. We find that early-entry platforms will preserve high margins in large early markets, where fierce price competition occurs once their rivals enter these markets. However, early entry is not always beneficial for platforms because the market-cannibalization effect emerges in the subsequent period. Furthermore, this effect will be amplified by the platforms' homing and entry strategies. In addition, cross-sided network effects lead buyers, sellers, and platforms to prefer a multi-homing policy, which is beneficial for society as a whole. Managerial insights are also provided for platform-based businesses.</p>

computer science, information systems, artificial intelligence,operations research & management science
Fighting Brand and Entry Deterrence

LUO Pin-liang,LU Yi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-9807.2007.04.004

2007-01-01

Abstract:Brand extensions is one of the focused research field in the theory of industrial organization.This Paper deeply studies the strategy of introducing fighting brand which is one of the most frequently used methods to deter entrance by the incumbent firms.A product differentiated Cournot model is constructed in this paper to show that the choice of fighting brand to deter entrance is highly related to the costs of entrance.Roughly speaking,when fixed entry cost is mediate,it is helpful to adopt the fighting brand strategy to deter entrance.However,if the fixed entry cost is so small or so large,the Incumbent may optimally remain silent to the entrant.This paper also solves the scope of that fixed costs suitable for introducing fighting brand through a simple numerical example,and discuss Its implications for entry and deterrence behaviors in the age of globalized economy.
Strategic Decisions of a Multi-Product Firm under Bertrand Competition

Hui-Ling Chung,Hung-Yi Chen,Yan-Shu Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2021.1910049

2021-01-01

Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics

Abstract:This research examines three strategies that a multi-product firm can adopt when facing a single-product entrant under Bertrand competition: (i) staying in the duopoly market, (ii) abandoning the duopoly market, and (iii) bundling the two goods. When the competing good is homogenous, bundling is the most profitable strategy if the product differentiation of the two goods produced by the multi-product firm is not too high. When the competing good is heterogeneous, the preferred strategy of the multi-product firm and the welfare ranking depend on the substitutability of the competing good and the degree of product differentiation between the two goods.
Cross-shareholding, Managerial capabilities, and Strategic risk-taking in enterprises: A game or a win-win?

Shuangjin Wang,Xiaoqian Zhang,Richard J. Cebula,Maggie Foley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105228

IF: 9.848

2024-04-01

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:In this study from 2007 to 2022, we explore the impact of cross-shareholding investors on the strategic risk-taking of A-share listed companies. The findings highlight that these stakeholders enhance strategic risk-taking through resource effects, advantageous information effects, with resource effects playing the most significant role. Managerial abilities further amplify this impact, showing substantial moderating effects. The positive influence is more pronounced for enterprises in low competitive positions with high-quality internal control. Stable cross-shareholding investors have a more pronounced positive impact compared to speculative ones, while non-peer cross-shareholding investors show no significant impact.

business, finance
Entry Deterrence Strategies for an Incumbent Supply Chain in the Presence of Inertial Consumer and Optimistic Entrant

Peng Xu,Tiaojun Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13413

IF: 3.61

2023-01-01

International Transactions in Operational Research

Abstract:When entering a new market, entrepreneurs generally hold an optimistic belief about the inertia of consumers (i.e., consumer's tendency to repurchase the incumbent product), leading to a high rate of failure. This paper constructs a supply chain with one manufacturer, one retailer, and one potential optimistic entrant who attempts to enter the wholesaling market. We characterize how the behaviors of the entrant's optimism and consumer's inertia jointly affect the pricing (deterrence) strategy of the incumbent manufacturer, entry strategy of the entrant, and equilibrium decisions in the post-entry game. Interestingly, our results show that: (i) in the post-entry game, both behaviors could benefit the two manufacturers but are detrimental to the retailer; (ii) in the entry strategy, when consumers are moderately inertial or the entrant is highly optimistic, the entrant will suffer from an incorrect entry decision and then has an unprofitable entry; (iii) in the pricing strategy, the incumbent manufacturer will set the normal wholesale price to blockade the entry if consumers have high inertia or the entrant has a low optimism; otherwise, he will set a new price to accommodate the entry. Furthermore, we discuss two different cases, finding that (iv) the existence of the retailer weakens the deterrent power of the incumbent manufacturer; and (v) the retailer will induce the manufacturer to accommodate the entry when the entrant is moderately optimistic.
Strategic Wholesale Pricing in a Supply Chain with a Potential Entrant

Tiaojun Xiao,Xiangtong Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.023

IF: 6.4

2010-01-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:This paper develops an adverse selection model for a two-stage supply chain with one supplier, one retailer, and a potential outside entrant supplier who makes a partially substitutable product. The work is different from most research on entry deterrence that only considers a single-stage model. Our main interest is to investigate how the incumbent supplier can strategically maximize her profit by a wholesale pricing policy when facing the potential entrant. We focus on a model where the entrant supplier will sell her product through the same incumbent retailer. We derive the optimal decisions for each player and study the comparative statics of the equilibrium. To investigate how the supply chain structure may affect the deterrence strategy of the incumbent supplier, we also consider three alternative models with different channel structures, when both suppliers sell their products directly, when the entrant has another independent retailer, and when the entrant sells her product directly. Through the comparison, we find that the existence of the common downstream retailer often enhances the deterring motivation of the incumbent supplier.
Institutional Cross-Holdings and Their Effect on Acquisition Decisions

Jarrad Harford,Dirk Jenter,Kai Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.008

IF: 8.9

2010-01-01

Journal of Financial Economics

Abstract:Cross-holdings are created when a shareholder of one firm holds shares in other firms as well, and cross-holdings alter shareholder preferences over corporate decisions that affect those other firms. Prior evidence suggests that such cross-holdings explain the puzzle of why shareholders allow acquisitions that reduce the value of the bidder. Conducting a shareholder-level analysis of cross-holdings, we instead find that cross-holdings are too small to matter in most acquisitions and that bidders do not bid more aggressively even in the few cases in which cross-holdings are large. We conclude that cross-holdings do not explain value-reducing acquisitions. Beyond acquisitions, we find that institutional cross-holdings between large firms have, in fact, increased rapidly over the last 20 years, but mostly due to indexing and quasi-indexing. As in acquisitions, cross-holdings by active investors are typically too small to matter.
Cross-Market Network Effect with Asymmetric Customer Loyalty: Implications for Competitive Advantage

Yuxin Chen,Jinhong Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0238

2007-01-01

Marketing Science

Abstract:A cross-market network effect exists in many industries (e.g., newspaper publishing, media, software) in which a seller sells both a primary and a secondary product (e.g., a newspaper publisher sells newspapers to readers and advertising space to advertisers), and the value of the secondary product depends on the size of the user base of the primary product. This paper examines the competitive implications of asymmetric customer loyalty in such markets. In traditional markets, an advantage in customer loyalty generates a profit advantage. We show here, however, that in the presence of a cross-market network effect, a midlevel of loyalty advantage in the primary product market can lead to an overall profit disadvantage. This surprising result is derived from the interdependence of the two markets, whereby a profit in one market may be gained at the cost of the other, and by the positive relationship between a larger loyalty segment and a higher opportunity cost of price competition in the product of the primary market. Extending our model to a two-period entry game also shows that under certain conditions, the entrant with disadvantage in customer loyalty can outperform the incumbent in profit and market share. This result suggests that asymmetry in customer loyalty can be a source of “first-mover” advantage or disadvantage.
Holding Excess Capacity to Deter Entry in a Labor-managed Industry

J. Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/135855

1993-01-01

Abstract:This paper considers the Dixit model of entry deterrence, and adapts it to the case in which firms are maximizing surplus per worker rather than profits. The properties of this model are analogous, but not identical, to those of the Dixit model. Of particular interest is the possibility that the best response functions may be positively sloped, even though demand satisfies that a firm's marginal revenue is decreasing in rival firms' output. This possibility implies the existence of perfect equilibria in which the incumbent holds excess capacity, which is not possible in the Dixit model given the above condition.
Cross-ownership and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility under price competition

Mingqing Xing,Sang-Ho Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x24000032

2024-03-12

Environment and Development Economics

Abstract:This paper examines the impact of cross-ownership on the strategic incentive of environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) within a green managerial delegation contract in a triopoly market engaged in price competition. It demonstrates that bilateral cross-ownership between insiders provides weak incentives to undertake ECSR, which has a non-monotone relationship with cross-ownership shares, while it provides strong incentives for outsiders, which increases the ECSR level as cross-ownership increases. It also compares unilateral cross-ownership and finds that a firm that owns shares in its rival has a greater incentive to undertake ECSR than its partially-owned rival, while an outsider has more incentive than firms in bilateral scenarios. These findings reveal that a firm's incentive to increase a market price through ECSR critically depends on its cross-ownership share, while it decreases environmental damage and increases social welfare when the environmental damage is serious.

economics,environmental studies
The Competition of Investments for Endogenous Transportation Costs in A Spatial Model

Haiyang Hou,Xiaobo Wu,Weihua Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.12.022

IF: 4.7

2013-01-01

Economic Modelling

Abstract:This paper proposes a two-stage spatial duopoly model to explore how the firms improve the value of product by service enhancement. In the model, we assume that the higher service ability means lower transportation cost. The results show that when two private firms participate in competition, no firm tends to invest more under the profit-maximizing objection. But when one is a public firm, the private firm may participate in competition with better service and higher price relative to the public one.
An Analytic and Regulatory Framework on Shares Cross-holding

Guo Li

2009-01-01

Abstract:The cross-holding between companies has salient positive and ill effects,the latter of which demand particular emphasis.Co-developed with systems of main bank and life-term employment,cross-holding has contributed to the spike and collapse of Japanese economy.Currency appreciation,accounting rules changes,plus capital market restructuring,may put China in the similar shoes.Regulations should start with the direct cross-holding,with different treatments towards the vertical and horizontal ones,through share acquisition ban,and a freezing or ceiling on the right exercise.Non-tradable shares reform and mark-to-market accounting policy have encouraged the investment of one listed company on another,and increased the stock market volatility,which might further transform to the typical cross-holding for the purpose of anti-takeover.
A theory of entry dissuasion

Domenico Buccella,Luciano Fanti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12441

2024-02-07

Bulletin of Economic Research

Abstract:In an industry with homogeneous goods, this note compares the standard incumbent's strategic capacity choice versus the incumbent's pre‐emptive payment (profit) transfer (PPT) strategy (i.e., pre‐entry acquisition). It is shown that via the transfer option, the incumbent holds its monopoly position "dissuading" the potential competitor entry for a range of fixed costs larger than under strategic capacity. Moreover, in that range, at least one firm is better off under PPT, while the other is indifferent between PPT and capacity choice. That is, in contestable markets, the incumbent can keep its dominant position in an easier way than standard models predict.

economics
Strategic Inventory and Supplier Encroachment

Huiqi Guan,Haresh Gurnani,Xin Geng,Yadong Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0705

2019-01-01

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management

Abstract:Problem definition: In a two-period model of a dyadic supply chain, we study the interaction between the use of strategic inventory withholding by the buyer and the use of a direct selling channel (encroachment) by the supplier in the second period. Academic/practical relevance: While the extant OM literature has individually examined the two strategies, the system-wide combined effect of these strategies has not been studied. Methodology: We fill the gap by building and analyzing two decentralized models of vertical competition. The main model focuses on sequential quantity decisions where the buyer decides on its order quantity and sets its selling quantity, with a first-mover advantage, before the supplier decides on its direct selling quantity. In an extension, we also consider an alternative timing structure of simultaneous quantity competition. Results: For the sequential model, we find that for any finite holding cost, the buyer may withhold strategic inventory in certain cases. This makes the supplier less aggressive in using its direct selling strategy compared to the case when strategic inventory is not an option. Moreover, there exist situations where both the supplier and the buyer make higher profits from the combined use of their respective strategies at the same time. For the simultaneous model, the buyer can achieve higher profit than in the sequential model in certain scenarios. However, the supplier’s profit may drop below the benchmark case (when neither strategic inventory nor direct selling is present), which is not seen in the sequential model. As such, the buyer can benefit from losing its first-mover advantage, whereas the supplier may be worse off. Managerial implications: Our study provides useful managerial insights into the strategic (joint) moves of the players in a supply chain. We show that both the supplier and the buyer can benefit from vertical competition. Moreover, the first-mover advantage may not always increase profits for the players.
Asset Prices with Investor Protection and Survival Analysis of Shareholders in the Cross-Sectional Economy

Jia Yue,Ming-hui Wang,Nan-jing Huang,Ben-zhang Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4022955

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In this paper, we consider a dynamic asset pricing model in a cross-sectional economy with two firms where a controlling shareholder cannot divert output in one firm with perfect investor protection for minority shareholders and where he can divert a fraction of output in the other firm with imperfect protection. After obtaining the parameters of asset prices by solving the shareholders' consumption-portfolio problems in equilibrium, our model features the effect of investor protection and cross-section in the economy. Furthermore, some survival analysis of the shareholders is presented and sufficient conditions on extinction of the shareholders are given in either firm. Our numerical results are in line with some empirical evidence: (i) poorer investor protection in the cross-sectional economy enables the controlling shareholder to hold less shares of the firm with perfect protection and more shares of the firm with imperfect protection, decreases stock gross returns of both firms, increases stock volatilities of both firms, and decreases interest rates of the economy; (ii) compared with the economy with the single relative firm, for the firm with perfect protection, cross-section enables the controlling shareholder to hold less shares, decreases stock returns, increases stock volatilities slightly and decreases interest rates, while for the firm with imperfect protection, cross-section enables the controlling shareholder to hold more shares, increases stock returns and volatilities and increases interest rates.

English Else
Entry Deterrence and Strategic Alliances: Evidence from a Dynamic Structural Econometric Model

Philip G. Gayle,Xin Xie

2013-01-01

Abstract:Researchers have written extensively on the impact that strategic alliances between airlines have on airfare, but little is known of the market entry deterrent impact of strategic alliances. Using a structural econometric model, this paper examines the market entry deterrent impact of codesharing, a form of strategic alliance, between incumbent carriers in domestic air travel markets. We find that a specific type of codesharing between market incumbents has a market entry deterrent effect to Southwest Airlines, but not other potential entrants. We quantify the extent to which market incumbents’ codesharing influences market entry cost of potential entrants.
Cross-listing and predation risk in product markets

Lu Jolly Zhou,Weimin Kong,Yunshen Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101860

2023-10-15

Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

Abstract:This study examines the relationship between cross-listing and product market predation risk by using cross-listed firm-level data in both A and H shares. Results investigate that firms which cross-listing in different capital markets could significantly alleviate the threat of predatory from rivals in the product market. Consistent with competitive advantage and information asymmetry hypotheses, the mechanism analysis shows that higher competitive position and better subsequent corporate accounting information environment may lead to lower predation risk for cross-listed firms. Moreover, subsample evidence suggests that cross-listing is more likely to be used as a device to decline predatory threats in countries with incomplete markets with more government intervention, higher judicial civilization, and greater financial development. Cross-listing could also decrease the firms' stock price crash risk in the capital market. Lastly, research findings offer powerful evidence and references to firms in emerging markets attempting to cross-list in other developed markets.

economics,business, finance
ENTRY DETERRENCE AND STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

Philip G. Gayle,Xin Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12559

2018-01-01

Economic Inquiry

Abstract:Researchers have written extensively on the impact that strategic alliances between airlines have on airfare, but little is known of the market entry deterrent impact of strategic alliances. Using a structural econometric model, this paper examines the market entry deterrent impact of codesharing, a form of strategic alliance, between incumbent carriers in domestic air travel markets. We find evidence of market entry deterrence, but deterrence impact depends on the specific type of codesharing between market incumbents as well as the identity of the potential entrant. We quantify the extent to which market incumbents' codesharing influences potential entrants' market entry cost and probability of market entry. (JEL L13, L93)

Passive Cross Holding As a Strategic Entry Deterrence

Passive cross‐holdings, horizontal differentiation, and welfare

Open or Closed? Technology Sharing, Supplier Investment, and Competition

Platform entry and homing as competitive strategies under cross-sided network effects

Fighting Brand and Entry Deterrence

Strategic Decisions of a Multi-Product Firm under Bertrand Competition

Cross-shareholding, Managerial capabilities, and Strategic risk-taking in enterprises: A game or a win-win?

Entry Deterrence Strategies for an Incumbent Supply Chain in the Presence of Inertial Consumer and Optimistic Entrant

Strategic Wholesale Pricing in a Supply Chain with a Potential Entrant

Institutional Cross-Holdings and Their Effect on Acquisition Decisions

Cross-Market Network Effect with Asymmetric Customer Loyalty: Implications for Competitive Advantage

Holding Excess Capacity to Deter Entry in a Labor-managed Industry

Cross-ownership and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility under price competition

The Competition of Investments for Endogenous Transportation Costs in A Spatial Model

An Analytic and Regulatory Framework on Shares Cross-holding

A theory of entry dissuasion

Strategic Inventory and Supplier Encroachment

Asset Prices with Investor Protection and Survival Analysis of Shareholders in the Cross-Sectional Economy

Entry Deterrence and Strategic Alliances: Evidence from a Dynamic Structural Econometric Model

Cross-listing and predation risk in product markets

ENTRY DETERRENCE AND STRATEGIC ALLIANCES