Mixed pricing in oligopoly with limited monopoly

Zhong Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.08.021

IF: 1.469

2014-01-01

Economics Letters

Abstract:We analyze price competition between two brands. Buyers consist of switchers and two segments of customers with limited brand loyalty. We identify a unique symmetric mixed-strategy price equilibrium and find that competition is most relaxed when there exists some switchers.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Oligopoly Pricing

Jianwei Huang,Lin Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79263-2_6

2013-01-01

Abstract:In Chapter 5, we considered how a single decision maker, the monopolist, chooses the price(s) to maximize the profit. In this chapter, we consider a more complicated and yet more common situation, where many self-interested individuals (including firms and consumers) make interdependent interactions, that is, the payoff of each individual depends not only on his own choices, but also on the choices of other individuals. Such an interaction can be analyzed by game theory. After introducing the basic concepts of game theory following [38,39,40,41], we will look at multiple classical market competition models, including the Cournot competition based on output quantities, the Bertrand competition based on pricing, and the Hotelling model that captures the location information in the competition.
Price Strategy and Network-Size Allocation Strategy in a Two-Sided Monopoly Market

Feiran Chen,Daoli Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3146878

2018-01-01

Abstract:We analyzed price strategy and network-size allocation strategy for a two-sided monopoly platform through the choice behaviour of vertical differential two-sided users. Considering the multiple market equilibria, we developed price strategies for both optimistic and pessimistic decision preferences. Notably, we found the duality of optimal optimistic pricing strategy and optimal network-size allocation strategy.
Monopoly Pricing Strategy with Network Externality

XJ Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2006.01.015

2006-01-01

Abstract:In this paper, we examined the price and welfare effect of price discrimination in a differentiated goods oligopoly market with network externality. And we compare in the equilibrium price, profit and output between the discriminated pricing and uniform pricing case. We also discussed the effect of network externality on the equilibrium result. We show that competitive price discrimination and network externality may intensify competition and the price discrimination increase the social welfare under oligopoly market with network externality. If firms differ in which markets they target for aggressive pricing strategy and competitive firm's reaction is strong, prices in all markets may fall. So both firms agree on the strategies of setting the uniform pricing.
Strategic Decisions of a Multi-Product Firm under Bertrand Competition

Hui-Ling Chung,Hung-Yi Chen,Yan-Shu Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2021.1910049

2021-01-01

Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics

Abstract:This research examines three strategies that a multi-product firm can adopt when facing a single-product entrant under Bertrand competition: (i) staying in the duopoly market, (ii) abandoning the duopoly market, and (iii) bundling the two goods. When the competing good is homogenous, bundling is the most profitable strategy if the product differentiation of the two goods produced by the multi-product firm is not too high. When the competing good is heterogeneous, the preferred strategy of the multi-product firm and the welfare ranking depend on the substitutability of the competing good and the degree of product differentiation between the two goods.
Equilibrium Analysis of Pricing Competition and Cooperation in Supply Chain with One Common Manufacturer and Duopoly Retailers

Hu Huang,Hua Ke,Lei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.022

IF: 11.251

2016-01-01

International Journal of Production Economics

Abstract:This paper considers a pricing competition and cooperation problem in a two-echelon supply chain with one common manufacturer and duopoly retailers. Six decentralized game models are built to examine how pricing strategies (Bertrand and collusion) and power structures (manufacturer-dominant, retailers-dominant and non-dominant) affect supply chain members' performance. Specifically, without loss of generality, we rewrite our models as systems including only two parameters (retail substitutability and asymmetric parameter which represents the non-price difference between the two retailers) by standardizing prices and quantities. It is found that, regardless of the power structures, the two retailers' collusion behaviors will increase the sales prices and reduce the quantities of the product. The results demonstrate that whether the duopoly retailers benefit from their collusion behaviors depends on the power structures and the two parameters. We also state the conditions under which the manufacturer is better off giving up its power and making decision simultaneously with the two retailers even if it can move first. Some other managerial highlights are also presented in this paper.
Price Competition in Sequential Multi-Product Oligopolies

Awi Federgruen,Ming Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2437032

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We analyze a general model in which, at each echelon of the supply process, an arbitrary number of firms compete, offering one or multiple products to some or all of the firms at the next or possibly subsequent echelons or directly to the end consumer. At each echelon, the offered products are differentiated and the firms belonging to this echelon engage in price competition. The model assumes a general set of piece-wise linear consumer demand functions for all products (potentially) brought to the consumer market, where each product's demand volume may depend on the retail prices charged for all products; consumers' preferences over the various product/retailer combinations are general and asymmetric. Similarly the cost rates incurred by the firms at the most upstream echelon are general as well. We initially study a two-echelon sequential oligopoly with competing suppliers, each selling multiple products indirectly through a pool of multiple competing retailers or directly to end consumers. In some cases, a supplier may choose to sell some or all of its products simultaneously via its direct sales channel and indirectly via some or all of the retailers. We characterize the equilibrium behavior under linear price-only contracts. In the second stage, given wholesale prices and prices of direct sales channels selected in the first stage, all retailers simultaneously decide on their retail prices to maximize their total profits among all products of all suppliers they choose to do business with. In the first stage, the suppliers anticipate the retailers' responses and all suppliers simultaneously maximize their total prots from all channels direct or indirect channels by selecting the wholesale prices and direct sales channel prices. We show that in this two-stage competition model, a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium always exists. Multiple subgame perfect equilibria may arise but, if so, all equilibria are equivalent in the sense of generating unique demands and profits for all firms. We subsequently generalize our results to supply chain models with an arbitrary set of echelons, and show how all equilibrium performance measures can be computed with an efficient recursive scheme. The model may, also be used to evaluate the impact of various structural changes in the supply chain network.
Price Competition in Multi-Sided Markets

Guofu Tan,Junjie Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3029134

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper studies a general model of price competition among platforms offering differentiated services in multi-sided markets. We incorporate a general form of both within-side and cross-side externalities into a discrete choice model of random utility maximization by consumers on each side of the markets. We consider a two-stage game in which the platforms choose prices (or user fees) simultaneously in the first stage, followed by consumers on all sides simultaneously deciding which platform to join (single-homing) in the second stage. We show that in a symmetric setting with full market coverage, there exists a symmetric equilibrium in prices and the equilibrium price on each side follows a simple rule: The price equals the cost, plus a mark-up due to product differentiation, minus a subsidy due to cross-side externalities. The subsidy to each side accounts for the degree of the aggregate marginal externalities of that side imposed on all the other sides. As competition among platforms increases, both the product differentiation effect and the cross-subsidy are shown to decrease. As such, the price on one side can decrease while the price on another side may increase with the number of platforms. We also discuss the incentives for platforms to merge and the extent of excessive free entry of platforms into the markets as compared to the social optimum. We further compare uniform pricing rule with discriminatory pricing across different sides of the markets and find that the average price across sides under the discriminatory pricing is higher than the uniform price when the externalities are small or when the number of platforms is large. The impacts of consumers' outside options on the equilibrium prices are also studied.
Competitive Pricing Strategies in Social Networks

Ying-Ju Chen,Yves Zenou,Junjie Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3122763

2018-01-01

The RAND Journal of Economics

Abstract:We study pricing strategies of competing firms selling heterogeneous products to consumers. Goods are substitutes and there are network externalities between neighboring consumers. In equilibrium, firms price discriminate based on the network positions and charge lower prices to more central consumers. We also show that, under some conditions, firms' equilibrium profits decrease when either the network becomes denser or network effects increase. In contrast, consumers always benefit from being more connected to each other. We determine the optimal network structure and compare uniform pricing and discriminatory pricing from the perspectives of firms and consumers.
Oligopolistic Quantity Competition with Bounded Rationality and Social Comparison

Yan Li,Yefen Chen,Biying Shou,Xiaobo Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.020

IF: 11.251

2019-01-01

International Journal of Production Economics

Abstract:We study sales quantity competition among multiple sellers, through a combination of laboratory experiments and theoretical analyses. We conduct laboratory experiments with a 2×2 design from two dimensions: the procurement cost and the number of sellers. The experimental data eloquently exhibit bell-shaped distributions over all alternatives, with peak values consistently larger than the classical Nash equilibrium predictions. We propose a behavioral model which incorporates the behavioral elements of bounded rationality and social comparison, as well as time trends (the learning process). We derive several useful equilibrium properties of the model. The structural estimations show that the proposed behavioral model can effectively explain the experimental data.
Study of the horizontal competition of dual-channel retailer and traditional retailer with congestion negative effect of physical channel

Bing XU,Ping WANG,Bin ZHANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-0464.2018.01.017

2018-01-01

Abstract:Based on the Hotelling model,the game models were built to characterize the competition of one dual-channel retailer and one traditional retailer who are respectively located at two endpoints of linear market.The existence conditions and the equilibrium solutions for the competition equilibrium of two re-tailers were obtained under two situations such as differentiation pricing strategy and unified pricing strate-gy for products selling online and offline set by dual-channel retailer.The effectiveness of two pricing strat-egies and congestion negative effect affecting the competition equilibrium states were analyzed.Finally, some suggestions were proposed that the traditional retailer should speed up its transition and improve its service level,and the dual-channel retailer should make differentiation pricing for products selling online and offline and subdivide the market.
Multi-market Competition with Switching Cost and Two Category Consumers:On the Example of Electrical Retail Market

HU Han-hui,Wei Xing

2010-01-01

Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice

Abstract:The multi-market competition strategies of the incumbent electrical retailer across areas are analyzed in the electrical retail market based on the model of asymmetric duopoly price competition.After the separation of the transmission,distribution and sales of electricity,competition intensity and strategies are impacted by the share of loyal consumers and switching cost of active consumers,which make perfect competition difficulty.The results of the model and numerical examples show that expect equilibrium price is not the increasing function of switching cost.The decrease of switching cost may increase the market power as the loyal consumers share of the big company is high,while the price under bilateral access with low switching cost may higher than the expect price under unilateral access with high that as the loyal consumers share of the big company is not too high.
Limit Pricing and Banking Competition in Mixed Oligopoly

ZHOU XIANGYI,ZHAO JUEHANG,JI SHENGLIANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-472x.2013.05.010

2013-01-01

Abstract:Based on the background of the banking industry in China, this paper establishes limit pricing entry deterrence models with deposit as the strategic variable. A state-owned bank acts as the Stackelberg leader and a foreign bank acts as the follower, while a domestic private bank is the potential entrant. It is found that at the scenario of complete information, for most assumptions of deposit competition, the state-owned bank will choose to accommodate the private entrant no matter from the standpoint of its own profit or total utility.However, under some special assumptions, there are conflicts between double objectives of the state-owned bank: from the total utility standpoint, the state-owned will choose to accommodate the private counterpart; but from the standpoint of its own profit, it will use limit pricing to deter the private bank. i.e limit pricing could become the SPNE of the game. Moreover, it shows that the foreign bank free rides at some circumstances,which will bring out loss to the social welfare per se.
Oligopolistic Price Competition with a Continuous Demand

Pavlo R. Blavatskyy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2604623

2015-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Two related models of oligopolistic price competition with homogeneous products are presented. These models are based on weaker assumptions about consumer behavior compared to a classical Bertrand model. In both models firms do not necessarily face a discontinuous demand at an equilibrium price level. Hence, firms may charge an equilibrium price that is above their marginal cost (earning a strictly positive profit). The equilibrium price is lower when there are more firms and/or consumers are more sensitive to price changes. In the limit, when consumers are highly sensitive to price changes, both models converge to a classical Bertrand model.
Price Competition Between a Dual-Channel Retailer and a Pure Online Retailer

Wang Chun-xu,Guo Jun,X.U. Chuan-Yong

2014-01-01

Abstract:Price competition between dual-channel and pure online retailers frequently occurs in reality, but the result is too complex to foresee. Pricing strategy and management advices are given in this paper to help enterprises solve problems of price competition. Focused on the price competition between a dual-channel retailer and a pure online retailer, and the uniform pricing strategy was adopted by the dual-channel retailer to avoid channel conflicts. A linear demand model which contained the substitution effect was adopted to characterize the competition between different channels and a non-cooperative game model was built to obtain the pricing equilibrium. Several specific scenarios were set to compare the pricing strategies of retailers. From the findings it can be concluded that whether the dual-channel retailer has an advantage over the pure online retailer in competition depends on the relative size of online market to the traditional channel market and the dual-channel retailer's main sales channel should be gradually shifted from the offline to online, and the traditional channel will be a complementary channel of online channel to improve the user experience. When the dual-channel retailer has no obvious advantage on market size, the pure online retailer will benefit more from price competition.
Pricing strategies for competitive firms with indirect network effects

Wenzhu Zhang,Yue Dai,Lin Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-020-09383-7

IF: 2.2092

2020-01-01

Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal

Abstract:In this paper, we analyze the impact of indirect network effects and competition on two firms each offering two complementary products. We first formulate the pricing game with general network effects and show that it is neither a supermodular nor a submodular game. We then derive the closed-form Nash equilibrium with linear demand functions. Furthermore, we examine a model with two symmetric firms each having a major product and a minor product, where the major product of one firm is the minor one of the other. We find that the impacts of network effects of major and minor products on the equilibrium prices are not symmetric. Moreover, as the substitution rate increases, the firm might partially sacrifice the major product market to boost the minor product market when the substitution rate is low and the network effect of the minor product is quite weak compared to that of the major product. Our numerical analysis shows that strong externalities between the two complementary products will benefit the firms. Finally, the models with symmetric product structures and generalized customer preference are analyzed to verify the robustness of the main results.
Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures

Zheng Luo,Xu Chen,Jing Chen,Xiaojun Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.046

IF: 6.4

2017-06-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:We investigate a supply chain in which a retailer is supplied by two manufacturers with differentiated brands, a good brand and an average brand. The customers in the market are segmented based on value and brand preference, namely the customer acceptance of the average brand and the customer surplus for each brand. Both horizontal competition (between the two competing manufacturers) and vertical competition (between the manufacturers and the retailer) are considered through an exploration of different power structure combinations. Multiple-stage game models are developed to examine the impact of different power structures on the pricing decisions and the profits of the manufacturers and the retailer. We find that intensified competition between the two manufacturers hurts the manufacturers and benefits the retailer. No dominance among supply chain members (the two manufacturers and the retailer) leads to the highest profit for the entire supply chain. We also find that for the two competing manufacturers, being first to announce the pricing decision results in lower profit – the second to announce benefits from knowing the rival's price. This explains why rivals prefer not to reveal decisions on prices, bid rates, and contracts, as this information represents bargaining power. The impact of customer acceptance of the average brand is also analyzed.

operations research & management science
Pricing Decision in A Dual-Channel System with Heterogeneous Consumers

Feng Li,Junling Liu,Ying Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40660-7_45

2015-01-01

Abstract:This paper studies the impact of consumer behavior factor on pricing strategy of a dual-channel supply chain system, which consists of a manufacturer and an independent retailer. We describe a manufacturer-leader Stackelberg game scenario. In the market, potential customers make their own purchasing decision according to product price on each channel, their preference for each channel-loyalty, and degree of rationality in decision-making process, etc. To represent behaviors of heterogeneous potential customers in the market, agent-based modeling and simulation is introduced to model each customer. Our numerical results show the manufacturer prefers to regard customer as being perfect rationality. On the other side, the retailer prefers to bargain for that rationality.
Competition in Dual Markets: Two Game-Theoretical Models on Pricing in Online versus Multiple Channels

Yuanzhu Lu, Xiaolin Xing, Fang-Fang Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17256/jer.2009.14.2.001

2009-01-01

Journal of Economic Research (JER)

Abstract:This paper develops two theoretical models to explain why multichannel retailers (MCRs) usually price higher than pure Internet retailers (DotComs), a regular pattern observed in many empirical studies. In the first game-theoretical model, we assume that the number of non-MCRs in the conventional market is exogenously determined, while consumers are classified into three discrete groups: (a) aggressive consumers, (b) discreet online consumers, and (c) offline consumers. We relax the first constraint in the second model so that all retailers in the Brick & Mortar sector are potential MCRs. Before setting prices, these retailers have to make their entry choices. Then, the pricing distribution becomes related to the factors such as the number of retailers in two markets, the search costs, and the pricing strategies of the retailers in the online market. We explore how the different types of retailers compete in the dual channels. We find that MCRs benet from the existence of their conventional stores, since they can charge higher prices than marginal production cost and earn positive profits. However, if DotComs cannot differentiate themselves by building loyal consumers or investing in the new technology, they face the severe competition both from their own type and from MCRs, and gain zero profits. The price dispersion may exist in the long term due to the pricing strategy for MCRs to conciliate the competition in online market.
Pricing Strategy of A Multi-product Monopolist with Dependent Demands

WEI Xin,ZHU Yi-min,HU Qi-ying

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3221.2012.05.027

2012-01-01

Abstract:In this paper,we study the pricing strategy of a multi-product monopolist.We classify all products of the monopolist into two categories: common goods and value-added goods.Common goods can be regarded as necessity,while the demand of value-added goods is assumed to be dependent on that of common goods.After purchasing of common goods,a proportion of consumers will continue to buy different value-added products or services.The problem for the firm is to set an optimal price for each product so that the total profit is maximized.Under the condition that demands are linear and exponential functions of price,respectively,we provide the optimal pricing strategies and discuss their properties and applications.A common strategy is the monopolist will set a higher price to value-added products while lowering the price of public goods in order to attract more basic consumers.Finally,through a numerical case and sensitive analysis,we illustrate the feasibility and use of the models.Our examples show when the coefficient of price sensitivity is close to zero,the optimal prices fluctuate along with it;as the coefficient grows,its impact on pricing strategy decreases.
Consumer Heterogeneity and Pricing Strategies:A Quality-Price Competition Model

Xiao-dong SUN,Peng TIAN,Li ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2013.03.009

2013-01-01

Abstract:We consider duopoly quality-price competition in a market with two types of consumers: price-sensitive consumers and quality-sensitive consumers.The characteristics of consumers are reflected by both the price sensitivity and the quality sensitivity.We first establish the utility function for each type of consumers and derive the demand function for every firm based on Hotelling model.Then,we analyze the duopoly quality-price competition under two pricing strategies: uniform pricing sand discriminatory pricing.The results show that under price discrimination the quality is higher than that under the uniform pricing strategy;firms set lower prices for price-sensitive consumers and higher price for quality-sensitive consumers.By comparisons,we conclude that the firms may carry out discriminatory pricing when consumer's transportation cost is high,and adopt uniform pricing when consumer's transportation cost is low.Additionally,the proportion of different types of consumers has significant impact on equilibrium prices and qualities.

Mixed pricing in oligopoly with limited monopoly

Oligopoly Pricing

Price Strategy and Network-Size Allocation Strategy in a Two-Sided Monopoly Market

Monopoly Pricing Strategy with Network Externality

Strategic Decisions of a Multi-Product Firm under Bertrand Competition

Equilibrium Analysis of Pricing Competition and Cooperation in Supply Chain with One Common Manufacturer and Duopoly Retailers

Price Competition in Sequential Multi-Product Oligopolies

Price Competition in Multi-Sided Markets

Competitive Pricing Strategies in Social Networks

Oligopolistic Quantity Competition with Bounded Rationality and Social Comparison

Study of the horizontal competition of dual-channel retailer and traditional retailer with congestion negative effect of physical channel

Multi-market Competition with Switching Cost and Two Category Consumers:On the Example of Electrical Retail Market

Limit Pricing and Banking Competition in Mixed Oligopoly

Oligopolistic Price Competition with a Continuous Demand

Price Competition Between a Dual-Channel Retailer and a Pure Online Retailer

Pricing strategies for competitive firms with indirect network effects

Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures

Pricing Decision in A Dual-Channel System with Heterogeneous Consumers

Competition in Dual Markets: Two Game-Theoretical Models on Pricing in Online versus Multiple Channels

Pricing Strategy of A Multi-product Monopolist with Dependent Demands

Consumer Heterogeneity and Pricing Strategies:A Quality-Price Competition Model