Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Jun Han,Yi Jiang,Xiao Liu,Qingyang Meng,Qiulei Xi,Qiulin Zhuang,Yusong Han,Ying Gao,Qiurong Ding,Guohao Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138580
IF: 3.7
2015-01-01
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Background and ObjectivesConsumption of dietary fat has been reported to be associated with gastric cancer risk, but the results of epidemiologic studies remain inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the association between dietary fat intake and gastric cancer risk.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed to identify observational studies providing quantitative estimates between dietary fat and gastric cancer risk. Random effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risk(SRR) in the highest versus lowest analysis. Categorical dose-response analysis was conducted to quantify the association between dietary fat intake and gastric cancer risk. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using I-2 and tau2(between study variance) statistics. Subgroup analysis and publication bias analysis were also performed.ResultsTwenty-two articles were included in the meta-analysis. The SRR for gastric cancer was 1.18 for individuals with highest intake versus lowest intake of total fat (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.999-1.39; n = 28; P< 0.001; tau(2) = 0.12; I-2 = 69.5%, 95% CI: 55%-79%) and 1.08 with a daily increase in total fat intake (20 g/d) (95% CI: 1.02-1.14; n = 6; P = 0.09; tau(2) = 0.002; I-2 = 46.8%, 95% CI: 0%-79%). Positive association between saturated fat intake (SRR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.09-1.58; n = 18; P<0.001; tau(2) = 0.08; I-2 = 60.6%, 95% CI: 34%-76%), inverse association between polyunsaturated fat intake (SRR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.92; n = 16; P = 0.003; tau(2) = 0.06; I-2 = 56.2%, 95% CI: 23%-75%) and vegetable fat intake (SRR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41-0.74; n = 4; P = 0.12; tau(2) = 0.04; I-2 = 48.6%, 95% CI: 0%-83%), and no association between monounsaturated fat intake (SRR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.79-1.25; n = 14; P< 0.001; tau(2) = 0.10; I-2 = 63.0%, 95% CI: 34%-79%) and animal fat intake (SRR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.90-1.33; n = 6; P = 0.13; tau(2) = 0.02; I-2 = 42.0%, 95% CI: 0%-70%) and gastric cancer risk were observed.ConclusionsOur results suggest that intake of total fat is potentially positively associated with gastric cancer risk, and specific subtypes of fats account for different effects. However, these findings should be confirmed by further well-designed cohort studieswith detailed dietary assessments and strict control of confounders.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?