Surgical timing and long-term outcomes in patients with severe haemorrhagic spinal cord cavernous malformations
An Tian,Ziwei Cui,Jian Ren,Yeqing Ren,Ming Ye,Guilin Li,Chuan He,Xiaoyu Li,Gao Zeng,Peng Hu,Yongjie Ma,Jiaxing Yu,Jingwei Li,Lisong Bian,Fan Yang,Qianwen Li,Feng Ling,Tao Hong,Liyong Sun,Hongqi Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2023-002745
IF: 5.9
2023-11-10
Stroke and Vascular Neurology
Abstract:Background Surgical resection of the lesions remains the main treatment method for most symptomatic spinal cord cavernous malformations (SCCMs) to eliminate the occupation and associated subsequent lifelong haemorrhagic risk. However, the timing of surgical intervention remains controversial, especially for patients in the acute stage after severe haemorrhage. Methods Patients diagnosed with SCCMs who were surgically treated between January 2002 and December 2021 were selected and retrospectively reviewed. The Modified McCormick Scale (MMS) was used to evaluate neurological and disability status. All medical information was reviewed, and all patients were followed up for at least 6 months. Results A total of 279 patients were ultimately included. With regard to long-term outcomes, 110 (39.4%) patients improved, 159 (57.0%) remained unchanged and 10 (3.6%) worsened. For patients with an MMS score of 2–5 on admission, in univariate and multivariate analyses, a ≤6 weeks period between onset and surgery (adjusted OR 3.211, 95% CI 1.504 to 6.856, p=0.003) was a significant predictor of improved MMS. Among 69 patients who first presented with severe haemorrhage, undergoing surgery within 6 weeks of the onset of severe haemorrhage (adjusted OR 4.901, 95% CI 1.126 to 21.325, p=0.034) was significantly associated with improvement of MMS score. Conclusion Surgical timing can influence the long-term outcome of SCCMs. For patients with symptomatic SCCMs, especially those with severe haemorrhage, early surgical intervention within 6 weeks can provide more benefit.
clinical neurology