Baseline And Trend Of Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio As Prognostic Factors In Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Yu-Mu Chen,Chien-Hao Lai,Huang-Chih Chang,Tung-Ying Chao,Chia-Cheng Tseng,Wen-Feng Fang,Chin-Chou Wang,Yu-Hsiu Chung,Yi-Hsi Wang,Mao-Chang Su,Kuo-Tung Huang,Hung-Chen Chen,Ya-Chun Chang,Meng-Chih Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136252
IF: 3.7
2015-01-01
PLoS ONE
Abstract:BackgroundPatients with early-stage lung cancer who have a high baseline lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have a favorable prognosis. However, the prognostic significance of LMR in patients with advanced-stage EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has not been established. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the influence of LMR on clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in EGFR-mutant patients with NSCLC.Materials and MethodsOf 1310 lung cancer patients diagnosed between January 2011 and October 2013, 253 patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs for EGFR-mutant NSCLC were included. The cut-off values for baseline and the 1-month-to-baseline ratio of LMR (MBR), determined by using receiver operating characteristic curves, were 3.29 and 0.63, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 prognostic groups: high LMR and MBR, high LMR or MBR, and low LMR and MBR.ResultsThe mean patient age was 65.2 years, and 41% were men. The median PFS and OS were 10.3 and 22.0 months, respectively. The PFS in patients with high LMR and MBR, high LMR or MBR, and low LMR and MBR were 15.4, 7.1, and 2.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001), whereas the OS were 32.6, 13.7, and 5.1 months, respectively (p < 0.001).ConclusionA combination of baseline and trend of LMR can be used to identify patients with a high mortality risk in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?