Integrated Management of Root-Knot Nematodes on Tomato in Glasshouse Production Using Nematicides and A Biocontrol Agent, and Their Effect on Soil Microbial Communities

Jianbin Liu,Jingzu Sun,Jiyan Qiu,Xingzhong Liu,Meichun Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00002778
2014-01-01
Nematology
Abstract:Nematicides are the main method for managing root-knot nematodes but they are not environmentally benign. Biological control is one alternative that has a lower or no environmental impact. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two nematicides (Fosthiazate and Dazomet), a biocontrol agent (Purpureocillium lilacinum(=Paecilomyces lilacinus) YES-2), their combination on controlling root-knot nematodes on tomato plants and their effects on the rhizosphere microbial community in long-term glasshouse experiments. The gall index and numbers of second-stage juveniles (J2) were significantly reduced by the individual treatments of Fosthiazate, Dazomet orP. lilacinumYES-2.Purpureocillium lilacinumYES-2 combined with a half dose of Fosthiazate showed the most efficient control as indicated by gall index and number of J2 compared with the control treatment in glasshouse experiments conducted over a 5-year period (2007-2011). The bacterial and fungal biodiversity in soil measured using Biolog ECO MicroPlates and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprint was higher in the treatments ofP. lilacinumYES-2 alone or its combination with chemicals than in the treatments of Dazomet or Fosthiazate (in 2011 only). This study suggested a synergistic effect on the control of root-knot nematode byP. lilacinumYES-2 combined with Fosthiazate, and the contribution of these two treatments to the microbial communities in the soil.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?