Internal Branding of Tourism Enterprises:A Review of the Literature and Prospects for Future Research
Hui ZHANG,Changhong BAI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2018.03.011
2018-01-01
Abstract:Tourism services are intangible and are strongly characterized by experiential attributes. Consequently, it is difficult for customers to determine their quality in advance, as this only becomes apparent through consumption.As a result,customers'perceptions regarding tourism brands develop at a much slower pace than those relating to other product brands. Moreover, tourism services entail a higher level of uncertainty than other contexts involving tangible products, because brand managers have less direct control over tourism brands than they do over other brands.Thus,employees in tourism companies are required to demonstrate a high degree of knowledge and skills that are derived from their understanding of the brand value as well as their long-term working experiences. For these reasons, tourism companies should focus not only on brand building from a customer perspective but also on branding from the inside,that is,internal branding. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review and an assessment of the prospects for future research in the field of internal branding based on more than 100 studies published in the last 20 years. The theoretical base of internal branding research is derived from theories about internal marketing,service profit chains,and brand value chains.Based on existing definitions in the literature,internal branding is defined in this paper as follows. The employees of an organization internalize a service brand identity (i.e., a brand vision, culture, relationships, and personality) as a result of undergoing the following processes:(1)They are influenced by the organizational climate.(2)They are instructed by brand managers. (3) They are influenced by brand practices. Consequently, they internalize this identity conceptually, forming their own internal brand beliefs and committing themselves to fulfilling explicit and/or implicit brand promises made to customers through their intentionally undertaken activities. Four reasons why internal branding is distinct from two other relevant concepts,namely corporate branding and employer branding are discussed in the paper.First,although these three concepts were all developed in the 1990s,their associated backgrounds are quite different.Second,their target industries differ.Third, the branding objects are different. Last, the agents involved in the branding process are different. The paper also reveals the connections between these three concepts. It shows that internal branding and employer branding can support the process of corporate branding, viewed as a type of commitment management,in different ways. The paper also presents an analysis of the mechanisms of internal branding using a two-stage model and a micro-level model. The former model demonstrates how companies engage their employees in the branding process,whereas the latter shows how employees internalize the company's brand value into their personal value systems. Following this analysis, a holistic model of internal branding is developed,integrating the organizational and employee levels of internal branding as well as the relationship between internal and external branding.The model results suggest that internal brand communication, brand leadership, and brand training lead to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral changes of employees toward a tourism brand via three processes:social learning,social exchange,and social identity.Consequently,these changes among customers further enhance a tourism brand,leading in turn to improved market performance and higher stakeholder values of tourism companies. In the concluding section of the paper, several managerial implications of internal branding for tourism companies are reviewed and analyzed and future research directions are discussed.