Abstract:Summary Objectives The study aims to classify normal and pathological voices by leveraging the wav2vec 2.0 model as a feature extraction method in conjunction with machine learning classifiers. Methods Voice recordings were sourced from the publicly accessible VOICED database. The data underwent preprocessing, including normalization and data augmentation, before being input into the wav2vec 2.0 model for feature extraction. The extracted features were then used to train four machine learning models—Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF)—which were evaluated using Stratified K-Fold cross-validation. Performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, macro average, micro average, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and confusion matrix were utilized to assess model performance. Results The RF model achieved the highest accuracy (0.98 ± 0.02), alongside strong recall (0.97 ± 0.04), F1-score (0.95 ± 0.05), and consistently high area under the curve (AUC) values approaching 1.00, indicating superior classification performance. The DT model also demonstrated excellent performance, particularly in precision (0.97 ± 0.02) and F1-score (0.96 ± 0.02), with AUC values ranging from 0.86 to 1.00. Macro-averaged and micro-averaged analyses showed that the DT model provided the most balanced and consistent performance across all classes, while RF model exhibited robust performance across multiple metrics. Additionally, data augmentation significantly enhanced the performance of all models, with marked improvements in accuracy, recall, F1-score, and AUC values, especially notable in the RF and DT models. ROC curve analysis further confirms the consistency and reliability of the RF and SVM models across different folds, while confusion matrix analysis revealed that RF and SVM models had the fewest misclassifications in distinguishing "Normal" and "Pathological" samples. Consequently, RF and DT models emerged as the most robust performers, making them particularly well-suited for the voice classification task in this study. Conclusions The method of wav2vec 2.0 combining machine learning models proved highly effective in classifying normal and pathological voices, achieving exceptional accuracy and robustness across various machine evaluation metrics.

Research on Recognition of Pathological Voice by AD Tree

Pvd: A New Pathological Voice Dataset For Intra-Speaker Recognition Research Interest

A Novel and Efficient Voice Activity Detector Using Shape Features of Speech Wave.

Voice Disorder Classification Using Wav2vec 2.0 Feature Extraction

An Analytical Study of Speech Pathology Detection Based on MFCC and Deep Neural Networks

Pathological Voice Feature Selection Based on Neural Network

Nonlinear dynamic analysis of pathological voices

Effect of Vocal Cord Polyp on Mandarin Tones Recognition by Native Chinese Speakers.

Attentive-based Multi-level Feature Fusion for Voice Disorder Diagnosis

A Voice Disease Detection Method Based on MFCCs and Shallow CNN

Pathological voice detection using optimized deep residual neural network and explainable artificial intelligence

A Study on Voice Measures in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

Diagnosis of pathological speech with streamlined features for long short-term memory learning

Reproducible Machine Learning-based Voice Pathology Detection: Introducing the Pitch Difference Feature

Voiceprint recognition of Parkinson patients based on deep learning

A hybrid model for pathological voice recognition of post-stroke dysarthria by using 1DCNN and double-LSTM networks

Analysis and Detection of Pathological Voice using Glottal Source Features

Deep Learning Application for Vocal Fold Disease Prediction Through Voice Recognition: A Preliminary Development Study (Preprint)

A Study on Voice Measures in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

A Study on Voice Measures in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

[A research on depression recognition based on voice pre-training model]