A Semio-aesthetic Study of Designing Chinese Full Text
赵毅衡
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-0766.2023.02.013
2023-01-01
Abstract:Design is a preconceived plan to achieve a certain effect by intentionally changing an object. Through design, humans inject intentionality into natural objects, transforming them into artifacts and improving these artifacts into better objects that better serve human needs.Nature does not design; there is no design in the struggle for survival. Rather than saying that nature is suited for survival, it is more accurate to say that humans are striving to adapt to the natural world. Humans exist in a world that has been “designed by humans, ” with social and cultural designs that enable “artificial humans” to live in an artificial world.To survive in the world, humans must find ways to “design” nature. This is an extension of human subjectivity, which constantly seeks meaning in the world, including optimizing the environment to produce meaningful characteristics for the benefit of humanity.The practical activities of animals are determined by innate behavioral patterns passed down through genetics. In contrast, human design plans, as well as the tools or products produced from this design, reflect the social and cultural style of the community. The “scale” of design varies greatly and is entirely dependent on the intentions of the designer.Once nature is transformed according to the design plan, it takes on the meaning that humans have given it. Symbols are the perceptible means of interpreting meaning, which is most evident in design activities. Since the intention behind design is to change the meaning of an object, this design meaning will inevitably be expressed in a perceptible way. Without symbol activity, design would not be possible.Design may not always achieve its intended purpose, and there is always the possibility of miscalculation. In searching for the principles of design, we must begin with the special nature of design codes, since design itself is also “designed”. Before modern times, “humanization” evolved from the divine as the general principle of design, shaping the meaningful world that humans need. Today, it has been replaced by the universal realm of science. Overemphasizing the power of science to shape the world through scientific universalism may actually impoverish the human spiritual world.Artistry is the “anti-effect” part of design, with “artistic design” as the design effect that emphasizes artistry rather than utility. An item designed in this way not only provides utility to the user but also conveys value and appreciation that transcends the mundane. This “triple nature” is based on a fundamental paradox of symbolic aesthetics: art relies on purposelessness, but most designed objects must strive for utility.The overall plan for design is called “meta-design, ” or “design for design.” Each nation often insists on its own meta-design plan, which ultimately forms a comprehensive meta-design system that combines technology and aesthetics. All meta-designs ultimately seek a “grand unifying spirit, ” and attempt to intuitively demonstrate the ultimate reason for all things.Design semiotics is not just a technical problem, nor is it simply based on the changes in the shape of physical objects. It is the evolution of the “way” of meta-design, and is a profound imprint of historical progress.