Abstract:INTRODUCTION:In the classification of Mass Spectrometry (MS) proteomics data, peak detection, feature selection, and learning classifiers are critical to classification accuracy. To better understand which methods are more accurate when classifying data, some publicly available peak detection algorithms for Matrix assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-MS) data were recently compared; however, the issue of different feature selection methods and different classification models as they relate to classification performance has not been addressed. With the application of intelligent computing, much progress has been made in the development of feature selection methods and learning classifiers for the analysis of high-throughput biological data. The main objective of this paper is to compare the methods of feature selection and different learning classifiers when applied to MALDI-MS data and to provide a subsequent reference for the analysis of MS proteomics data.RESULTS:We compared a well-known method of feature selection, Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVMRFE), and a recently developed method, Gradient based Leave-one-out Gene Selection (GLGS) that effectively performs microarray data analysis. We also compared several learning classifiers including K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier (KNNC), Naïve Bayes Classifier (NBC), Nearest Mean Scaled Classifier (NMSC), uncorrelated normal based quadratic Bayes Classifier recorded as UDC, Support Vector Machines, and a distance metric learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor classifier (LMNN) based on Mahanalobis distance. To compare, we conducted a comprehensive experimental study using three types of MALDI-MS data.CONCLUSION:Regarding feature selection, SVMRFE outperformed GLGS in classification. As for the learning classifiers, when classification models derived from the best training were compared, SVMs performed the best with respect to the expected testing accuracy. However, the distance metric learning LMNN outperformed SVMs and other classifiers on evaluating the best testing. In such cases, the optimum classification model based on LMNN is worth investigating for future study.

Comparison of Auto and Manual Integration for Peptidomics Data Based on High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry

A fully automated system with online sample loading, isotope dimethyl labeling and multidimensional separation for high-throughput quantitative proteome analysis.

Study on chromatographic data pre-processing using fuzzy decision making in metabonomics.

An automated data analysis pipeline for GC-TOF-MS metabonomics studies.

Comparative analysis of MS/MS search algorithms in label-free shotgun proteomics for monitoring host-cell proteins using trapped ion mobility and ddaPASEF

Advanced Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Enables Merging Widely Targeted Metabolomics and Proteomics.

Comparative Evaluation of Proteome Discoverer and FragPipe for the TMT-Based Proteome Quantification

Comparative N-Glycoproteomics Analysis of Clinical Samples Via Different Mass Spectrometry Dissociation Methods

Evaluation of significant features discovered from different data acquisition modes in mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomics

Decoding the Challenges: navigating Intact Peptide Mass Spectrometry-Based Analysis for Biological Applications

Integrated Platform for Proteome Profiling with Combination of Microreversed Phase Based Protein and Peptide Separation Via Online Solvent Exchange and Protein Digestion.

The Effect of Data Integration on LC-MS-based Metabolomics Data: Evaluation on the Comparative Classification Capacities

Protein-Level Integration Strategy of Multiengine MS Spectra Search Results for Higher Confidence and Sequence Coverage

Automating data analysis for hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry using data-independent acquisition methodology

Comparison of analytical-flow, micro-flow and nano-flow LC-MS/MS for sub-proteome analysis

Untargeted LC–MS Data Preprocessing in Metabolomics

Peptimetric: Quantifying and Visualizing Differences in Peptidomic Data

Comparison of Feature Selection and Classification for MALDI-MS Data

A New Evaluation Metric for Quantitative Accuracy of LC-MS/MS-Based Proteomics with Data-Independent Acquisition

Comparison of 2-D LC and 3-D LC with post- and pre-tryptic-digestion SEC fractionation for proteome analysis of normal human liver tissue.

Comprehensive comparison of sample preparation workflows for proteomics