Abstract:Additive manufacturing (AM) enables flexible part geometry and functionality, and reduces product development life cycle by direct layer-wise fabrication from CAD files. In the last decade, great achievements are made on AM materials, machines, processes, etc. However, the quality of the AM parts is still questionable for industrial specifications. On the one hand, AM part quality variables can be either quantitative, such as dimensional accuracy, or qualitative, such as binary indicators for voids, missing features, or surface roughness. On the other hand, both offline process setting variables and functional in situ process variables can be measured and modeled with both quantitative and qualitative (QQ) quality response variables. In this paper, the QQ quality response variables are modeled by offline process setting variables and in situ process variables via functional QQ models. The modeling of these in situ process variables provides the basis for real-time monitoring and control for AM processes. Simulation studies and experimental data from a fused deposition modeling process are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Note to Practitioners—Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have attracted much attention and showed many advantages over the traditional subtractive manufacturing processes. However, the product quality issues make AM intractable for high-quality parts in industrial applications. This paper aims to address the quality issues by modeling both quantitative quality variables, such as dimensional accuracy, and qualitative quality variables, such as the binary (go/no-go) indicator for surface conditions. Both offline process setting variables and in situ process variables are used in the model as predictors. Such a model is important for systematically quality evaluation of AM parts, and provides the basis for future process monitoring and control. The merits of the proposed method are demonstrated with simulation studies and a case study in a fused deposition modeling process.

Data Fusion Based Quality Monitoring and Control of Strip Thickness

Integrated AGC Approach for Balancing the Thickness Dynamic Response and Shape Condition of a Hot Strip Rolling Control System

Quality-Related Monitoring and Control in Hot Strip Mill Process

Robust Coordinated Control of Hot Strip Mill Multivariable System

Hot-rolled strip laminar cooling process plant-wide temperature monitoring and control

Modeling and Simulation of Shape Control Based on Digital Twin Technology in Hot Strip Rolling

Robust Optimal Design for Shape and Gauge Composite Control of Cold Strip Mill

Dual Perturbation Agc Design Based On Qft/Mu Controller In Hot Strip Rolling Process

A real-time expert system with GPC for cold strip mill

Quality-Related Process Monitoring and Diagnosis of Hot-Rolled Strip Based on Weighted Statistical Feature KPLS

Modeling and Monitoring for Laminar Cooling Process of Hot Steel Strip Rolling with Time–Space Nature

Joint prediction method for strip thickness and flatness in hot strip rolling process: A combined multi-indicator Transformer with embedded sliding window

Material level detection of blast furnace based on the fusion of membership degree classification and sliding window Model

Thickness-Related Fault Diagnosis of Steel Strip Based on W-KPLS Method Considering Mechanism Weight Optimization

Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process.

Nash equilibrium-based distributed predictive control strategy for thickness and tension control on tandem cold rolling system

Data-Driven Quality Related Prediction and Monitoring

Dynamic Multimode Process Monitoring Using Recursive GMM and KPCA in a Hot Rolling Mill Process

Dual Perturbation AGC Design Based on QFT/µ Controller

Roll Eccentricity Compensation Based on Anti-Aliasing Wavelet Analysis Method

Real-Time Quality Monitoring of Ultrathin Sheets Edge Welding Based on Microvision Sensing and SOCIFS-SVM.