Changes of biological markers and brain PET imaging and clinical effects of memantine for patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: A 24-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Shifu Xiao,Tao Wang,Qiu Huang,Kewei Chen,Eric Reiman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.866
2011-01-01
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Abstract:In AD, significant changes of hyperphosphorylated tau levels in CSF are found in AD patients. FDG-PET has the unique ability to estimate the local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose consumption, thus providing information on the distribution of neuronal death and synapse dysfunction in vivo. This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. 22 AD patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment or the placebo group. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interleukin-10 (IL-10), amyloid ß-40 (Aß-40), total tau protein, measures of cognitive function tests such as the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) as well as FDG-PET were acquired at the baseline and after the 24 week treatment period. The memantine dose was 20mg/day from initially 5mg/day in the treatment group. For the image analysis, the follow-up PET was realigned to the baseline scan for each subject and both were normalized to the standard brain template using SPM8. The two groups did not differ in their age (placebo group 64.7 ± 11.5 vs treatment group 65.7 ± 12.5), gender (female/male 7/4 vs 7/4) and education (placebo group 7.2 ± 2.4 vs treatment group 6.9 ± 2.1). MMSE score (p = 0.02), ADAS-Cog (p = 0.03) and total SIB (p = 0.05) were statistically different between the two groups at week 24 though they were not at baseline (p = 0.08, 0.1 and 0.2 respectively). The change of SIB score was statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.037). The Plasma and CSF IL-10, Aß-40, total tau protein were not statistically different both at baseline and at week 24. The placebo group had significant FDG uptake decline in precuneus, posterior cingulate, temporal and occipital regions (p = 0.005 uncorrected). In comparison to the placebo group, the memantine treatment group either had a reduced decline in posterior cingulate and temporal or showed increase in FDG uptake at week 24 in precuneus and temporal (p = 0.005 uncorrected). Findings from this RCT support the possibility that memantine treatment in moderately to severely affected AD patients is associated with both clinical improvement and smaller CMRgl decline in AD-affected brain regions. Additional studies with larger samples and more frequent measurements are needed to confirm these findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?