Effectiveness of expressive writing therapy for postpartum women with psychological distress: Meta‐analysis and narrative review
Xueying Lim,Mei Qi Ang,Audrey Foo,Kimberly Kai Yi Chng,Serena Siew Lin Koh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16019
2024-12-11
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Abstract:Background The increasing prevalence of psychological distress among mothers is outpacing the effectiveness of conventional coping methods like cognitive behavioral therapy. The efficacy of alternatives such as writing therapy for maternal psychological well‐being remains uncertain due to a lack of extensive research and inconsistent findings. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of expressive writing therapy in comparison to standard postpartum care for alleviating psychological distress, encompassing symptoms of depression, anxiety, or stress, in postpartum women. Search Strategy For this purpose, seven bibliographic databases, including CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and gray literature were examined up to December 27, 2022 for randomized controlled trials, comparing expressive writing against standard care or controlled writing among postpartum women with psychological distress. Data Collection and Analysis Data was collected using a random effect model for meta‐analysis. Results A meta‐analysis of five studies with 483 participants found that expressive writing therapy was more effective than standard care or controlled writing in reducing postpartum depression and stress among women with psychological distress. Expressive writing resulted in a significant reduction in initial depression with standard mean difference (SMD) = −0.65%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −1.08 to −0.22, Z = 2.96, P = 0.003, in comparison to controlled writing as an intervention. Regarding expressive writing versus standard care, a narrative review was conducted due to an I2 above 75%. The results showed significant improvements compared to the baseline at the seventh day and third month post‐intervention. In terms of stress scores, there was a significant difference favoring expressive writing over standard care at the first month (SMD = −0.80%, 95% CI = −1.35 to −0.24, Z = 2.81, P = 0.005) and third month (SMD = −0.53%, 95% CI = −0.86 to −0.20, Z = 3.13, P = 0.002) post‐intervention. Stress scores are also greatly reduced for expressive writing versus controlled writing with SMD = −0.79%, 95% CI = −1.03 to −0.55, Z = 6.48, P
obstetrics & gynecology