Abstract:Two ways of designing low-order discrete-time (i.e. digital) controls for low-order plant (i.e. process) models are considered in this tutorial. The first polynomial method finds the controller coefficients that place the poles of the closed-loop feedback system at specified positions for adroit controls, i.e. for a rapid and compressed transient response, when the plant model is known precisely. The poles and zeros of the resulting controller are unconstrainted, although an integrator may be included in the controller structure as a special case to drive steady-state errors towards zero. The second frequency method ensures that the feedback system has the desired phase-margin at a specified gain cross-over frequency (for the desired bandwidth) yielding robust stability with respect to plant model uncertainty. The poles of the controller are at specified positions, e.g. for a standard Proportional-Integral (PI), Proportional-Derivative (PD), Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID), structure or other more general configurations if necessary, and the problem is solved for the controller zeros. The poles and zeros of the resulting closed-loop feedback system are unconstrained. These complementary design procedures allow simple and effective controls to be derived analytically from a plant model, using a matrix inverse operation to solve a small set of linear simultaneous equations, as an alternative to more heuristic (e.g. trial-and-error) or empirical PID-tuning approaches. An azimuth controller for a pan-tilt-zoom camera mount is used as an illustrative example. The ways in which both procedures may be used to design controls with the desired balance between adroitness and robustness are discussed.

On the Pole of Non-Square Transfer Function Matrix Moore–Penrose Pseudo-Inverses

Adaptive Inverse Control of Non-Linear Systems with Unknown Complex Hysteretic Non-Linearities

Adaptive Stabilization of Discrete-Time Nonminimum Phase Systems.

Robust analytical scheme for linear non-square systems

Pole Assignment for a Class of the Second Order Singular Distributed Parameter Control Systems

New method for SISO strong stabilization with advantages over existing methods

On Stability of Dynamical Controllers Using Pole Assignment

PI control of stable nonlinear plants using projected dynamical systems

Stability Analysis Using Quadratic Constraints for Systems With Neural Network Controllers

Controller design based on similar skew-symmetric structure for nonlinear plants

Regions of robust relative stability for PI controllers and LTI plants with unstructured multiplicative uncertainty: A second-order-based example

A note on stable perturbations of Moore-Penrose inverses.

Simple Digital Controls from Approximate Plant Models

On the Design of FIR Internal Model Controller Via QR Decomposition of the Plant Impulse Response Matrix

Classical Stability Margins by PID Control

Controller Design and Stability Analysis for Fuzzy Singularly Perturbed Systems

Controller Design for Matrix Second-Order Nonlinear Plants Based on Requirements on Tracking Performance and Disturbance Rejection

An Extended Inner–outer Factorisation Algorithm Based on the Structure of a Transfer Function Matrix Inverse

Mean-square Stabilizability via Output Feedback for Non-minimum Phase Networked Feedback Systems

On The Pole Assignment For A Class Of Generalized Control System

Stability Analysis And Robust Controller Design For Uncertain Discrete-Time Singularly Perturbed Systems