Abstract 1979: Algebraic Factorization of Gene Expression Profiles Reveals Subtype-Specific Drug Sensitivities among 54 Breast Cancer Cell Lines

William J. Gibb,Eric Collisson,James Korkola,Laura Heiser,Anguraj Sadanandam,Wen-Lin Kuo,Zhi Hu,Jian-Hua Mao,Nicholas Wang,Nora Bayani,Jessica Billig,Safiyyah Ziyad,Sophi Lewis,Heidi Feiler,Lakshmi Jakkula,Denise Wolf,Marc Lenburg,Paul Spellman,Joe Gray

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am10-1979

IF: 11.2

2010-01-01

Cancer Research

Abstract:Abstract Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with reproducible and prognostically important subclasses. Breast cancer cell lines are widely used to study preclinical investigational agents, but the relationships, if any, between breast cancer subclass and drug response are not well understood. To help bridge this gap, we have profiled drug responses across a large panel of well-annotated breast cancer cell lines. In order to translate in vitro drug responses into clinically useful predictions, it is important that the cell line panel be organized into subtypes representative of the cancer subtype diversity found in the clinic. Recent studies have demonstrated that an algebraic clustering method known as “non-negative matrix factorization” (NMF) can be applied to gene expression profiles to resolve clinically meaningful cancer subtypes in greater detail than achievable using other clustering methods. To test whether NMF improves our ability to resolve drug sensitivities in breast cancer cell lines, we clustered pretreatment gene expression profiles of 54 breast cancer cell lines using two different methods: (1) NMF-based consensus clustering and (2) hierarchical consensus clustering. Using NMF-based consensus, we identified five robust subtypes (two Basal-A, one Basal-B and two Luminal classes). In contrast, using hierarchical consensus clustering, we could identify only three robust subtypes (one Basal-A, one Basal-B and one Luminal class). The drug response profiles were then segregated by subtype to determine whether either of the two clustering methods improves our ability to resolve drug sensitivities. Of the 67 drug compounds included in our study, the 5-subtype NMF-based classification scheme revealed three compounds (AG1024, CPT-11 and topotecan) exhibiting subtype-specific drug effects (p<0.1) that are undetectable using the 3-subtype hierarchical clustering. The statistical significance of drug sensitivity was gauged using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, adjusted for false discovery rate Q=0.05. In conclusion, NMF consensus clustering can be used to detect drug response patterns that would otherwise go undetected. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1979.