Open, Single Arm Trial of Erlotinib As the 2nd/3rd Line Treatment in Advanced or Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Wild Type and C-Met Negative Expression (ml28941, C-Tong 1306)

Z. Li,T. Zhou,Y. Huang,H. Zhao,L. Chen,Y.Y. Zhao,W. Fang,P.Y. Yang,X. Hou,C. Xue,X.Y. Ma,Z. Hu,T. Qin,W. Liang,X. Wu,S. Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu348.24
IF: 51.769
2014-01-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations show excellent clinical benefit to Erlotinib. Since EGFR wild type constitutes approximately 70% NSCLC, it is also important to evaluatethe efficacy of Erlotinib in this group of patients. Preclinical study shows that c-Met over-expression could be the cause of EGFR-TKI primary and secondary resistance, which gives us a hint, that c-Met negative expression maybe feasible to exclude the purely resistant to EGFR TKIs,which could be considered as 2nd biomarker, as so called “bi-biomarker”.This concept is supported by a phase II study (OAM4558g, ASCO2011), which showed in patients withEGFR wild type and c-met negative expression population treated with Erlotinib had a longer duration of PFS versus Erlotinib plus Onartuzumab (2.7 vs. 1.4 months, stratified HR = 1.82; 95% CI: 0.99, 3.32). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erlotinib as the 2nd/3rd line treatment in stage IV NSCLC with EGFR wild type and c-met negative expression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?