We Now Know What Fly Photoreceptors Compute

Uwe Friederich,Stephen A Billings,Mikko Juusola,Daniel Coca
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-14-s1-o5
2013-01-01
BMC Neuroscience
Abstract:It has been known for some time that photoreceptors transmit more information when driven by stimuli which have 'naturalistic' statistical properties and that processing of naturalistic visual stimuli involves nonlinear transformations of the input signals. Until now it was not clear which statistical features of the stimuli the neurons are selectively 'tuned' to respond to. Another major difficulty was to elucidate the computational mechanisms which explain differences in coding naturalistic and Gaussian stimuli. Here we used a functional model of Drosophila photoreceptor to fully characterize their underlying computational capabilities. The model was derived based on photoreceptor responses measured in vivo using naturalistic input stimuli, which the system experiences in its natural environment. In order to characterize the nonlinear transformations performed by photoreceptors we analytically computed the higher-order or generalized frequency response functions (GFRFs) of the identified nonlinear photoreceptor model. Using this approach, we demonstrate, for the first time that the observed increase in power of photoreceptor response, and shift towards higher frequencies as the mean light intensity increases, is the result of changes in the operating point of the photoreceptor, which produces a change in the shape of the magnitude of the frequency response functions. This suggests that the photoreceptor adaptation mechanisms are not tuned to fully compensate for the drop in intensity in order to achieve, in an efficient way - by exploiting the photoreceptor nonlinearity - a change in the shape of the magnitude transfer functions, which are optimal for the given mean intensity level. Furthermore, we examined the significance of both local and non-local high-order phase correlations for fly vision. We simulated the photoreceptor model using synthetic stimuli sequences incorporating local phase correlations (edges) and non-local phase correlations (quadratic phase coupling) superimposed with Gaussian white noise. By decomposing voltage output of photoreceptor somata into linear second- and higher-order responses, we explain the nonlinear mechanisms responsible for coding the local and non-local higher-order statistical features in the stimuli as well as improving their signal-to-noise ratio. To validate the results, we carried out electrophysiological experiments using a specially designed stimuli sequence, which allows extracting the nonlinear component of the photoreceptor response directly from data, without a model.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?